Émile Chabal

496 citations
28 papers · 141 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • History top 5%
    • French Historical and Cultural Studies
    • North African History and Literature
    • European Political History Analysis
    • Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis

Papers in

Émile Chabal

24 papers receiving 128 citations

Peers

Émile Chabal
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • History 46
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • Political Science and International Relations 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 66
  • Urban Studies 7
Replace Serge Berstein with:
Serge Berstein France
Donald J. Raleigh United States
Claude Gauvard France
Barbara Stollberg‐Rilinger Germany
Jeremi Suri United States
Kaspar von Greyerz Switzerland
Lorenz M. Lüthi Canada
Cheryl B. Welch United States
G. Eley United States
Rafael Torres Sánchez Spain
Émile Chabal relative to Serge Berstein France Serge Berstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Serge Berstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Émile Chabal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Émile Chabal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Émile Chabal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Émile Chabal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Émile Chabal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Émile Chabal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Émile Chabal. The network helps show where Émile Chabal may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Émile Chabal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Émile Chabal Line = papers co-authored together Émile Chabal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201539
2 201925
3 20138
4 20168
5 20147
6 20166
7 20136
8 20195
9 20234
10 20104
11 20144
12 20154
13
Historicising the French Revolution
20083
14 20223
15
The Politics of Disagreement
20122
16 20232
17 20142
18 20162
19 20142
20 20161

About Émile Chabal

Émile Chabal is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and Archeology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Historical and Cultural Studies (11 papers), European Political History Analysis (8 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (7 papers), Political and Social Issues (6 papers), North African History and Literature (5 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (3 papers), Cultural Identity and Heritage (2 papers) and Communism, Protests, Social Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (46 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), Political Science and International Relations (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (66 citations) and Urban Studies (7 citations). Émile Chabal has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Behrent and Christina Boswell. Their work appears in journals such as Modern & Contemporary France, French History, Contemporary European History, Intellectual History Review and International Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact