This map shows the geographic impact of Emil Weydert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emil Weydert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emil Weydert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emil Weydert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emil Weydert. The network helps show where Emil Weydert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emil Weydert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emil Weydert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emil Weydert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Emil Weydert. Emil Weydert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lang, Jérôme, Leendert van der Torre, & Emil Weydert. (2003). Hidden uncertainty in the logical representation of desires. 685–690.20 indexed citations
6.
Lang, Jérôme, Leendert van der Torre, & Emil Weydert. (2002). Utilitarian Desires. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 5(3). 329–363.48 indexed citations
7.
Weydert, Emil. (2001). Rankings we prefer: a rational minimal construction semantics for default reasoning. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 1–12.1 indexed citations
Torre, Leendert van der & Emil Weydert. (2001). Parameters for Utilitarian Desires in a Qualitative Decision Theory. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 14. 285–301.5 indexed citations
10.
Weydert, Emil. (2000). How to revise ranked probabilities. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 38–42.1 indexed citations
11.
Weydert, Emil. (1999). JZBR - Iterated Belief Change for Conditional Ranking Constraints. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 57–66.3 indexed citations
12.
Weydert, Emil. (1998). SYSTEM JZ - How to Build a Canonical Ranking Model of a Default Knowledge Base.. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 190–201.9 indexed citations
13.
Weydert, Emil & Leendert van der Torre. (1998). Goals, desires, utilities and preferences. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 11(1). 57–64.3 indexed citations
Weydert, Emil. (1996). System J - Revision Entailment: Default Reasoning through Ranking Measure Updates. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 637–649.1 indexed citations
16.
Jaeger, Manfred, Heikki Mannila, & Emil Weydert. (1996). Data Mining as Selective Theory Extraction in Probabilistic Logic. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.2 indexed citations
17.
Weydert, Emil. (1995). Default Entailment. A preferential construction semantics for defeasible inference. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 173–184.3 indexed citations
18.
Hustadt, Ullrich, Manfred Jaeger, Andreas Nonnengart, et al.. (1994). Description Logics for Natural Language Processing. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 80–84.1 indexed citations
19.
Weydert, Emil. (1992). Hyperrational Conditionals - Monotonic Reasoning About Nested Default Conditionals. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 310–332.1 indexed citations
20.
Weydert, Emil. (1991). Elementary Hyperentailment -Nonmonotonic reasoning about defaults-. 352–359.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.