Emiel de Lange
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 4
-
- Environmental Education and Sustainability 8
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 5
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 2
-
- Animal and Plant Science Education 4
-
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 4
-
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 2
-
- Plant and animal studies 2
- Co-authors
- E.J. Milner‐GullandEmily WoodhouseAidan KeaneHarriet IbbettStephanie BrittainDiogo VeríssimoJérôme LewisO. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo
- Journals
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution (1 paper)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)Conservation Biology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Emiel de Lange
19 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Ecological Modeling 46
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 96
- Global and Planetary Change 116
- Ecology 86
- Social Psychology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Emiel de Lange
This map shows the geographic impact of Emiel de Lange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emiel de Lange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emiel de Lange more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emiel de Lange
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emiel de Lange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emiel de Lange. The network helps show where Emiel de Lange may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emiel de Lange, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 85 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 69 | |
| 19 | [Day-night therapy- a necessary step towards better care for mental patients]. | 1976 | 4 |
About Emiel de Lange
Emiel de Lange is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (8 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (46 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (96 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (116 citations). Emiel de Lange has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include E.J. Milner‐Gulland, Emily Woodhouse, Aidan Keane, Harriet Ibbett, Stephanie Brittain, Diogo Veríssimo, Jérôme Lewis, O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo, Leejiah Dorward and Julia L. Newth. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Conservation Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.