Emerson Day

933 citations
22 papers · 654 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Papers in

    • Bone health and treatments 2
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 2
    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 6

Emerson Day

22 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Emerson Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Otorhinolaryngology 60
  • Oncology 214
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 61
  • Epidemiology 244
  • Microbiology 33
Replace Mary Corkill with:
Mary Corkill United States
Jacalyn L. Papillo United States
V. Shanta India
E. Boesen United Kingdom
M Hakama Finland
Adolf Štafl United States
Rolf E. J. Ten Seldam Australia
Luciano Serpa Hammes Brazil
Lydia Howell United States
E. J. Buxton United Kingdom
Emerson Day relative to Mary Corkill United States Mary Corkill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Mary Corkill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emerson Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emerson Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emerson Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emerson Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emerson Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emerson Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emerson Day. The network helps show where Emerson Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Emerson Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emerson Day Line = papers co-authored together Emerson Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1963186
2 1956143
3 1960116
4 195230
5 195428
6 196424
7 195620
8 195616
9 196612
10 195711
11 196310
12 196210
13 195610
14 19567
15 19535
16 19605
17 19615
18 19544
19 19534
20 19613

About Emerson Day

Emerson Day is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (4 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Bone health and treatments (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (60 citations), Oncology (214 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (61 citations), Epidemiology (244 citations) and Microbiology (33 citations). Emerson Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Irwin J. Bross, Ernest L. Wynder, G Bader, Michael R. Deddish, Ralph E. Hertz, Leopold G. Koss, Fred W. Stewart, Frank W. Foote, B. H. Kean and Morton K. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Medical Clinics of North America, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact