E.M.A. Smets
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
-
- Sleep and related disorders
- Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Papers in
- Oncology 3
- Cancer survivorship and care 3
-
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research 3
- Co-authors
- Bert Garssen (5 shared papers)J.C.J.M. de Haes (2 shared papers)B. Bonke (1 shared paper)Jan H. Vercoulen (2 shared papers)Mark J. Alberts (2 shared papers)Gijs Bleijenberg (2 shared papers)Marja Visser (1 shared paper)Nico H. Frijda (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (2 papers)Rehabilitation Oncology (1 paper)Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
E.M.A. Smets
5 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 370
- Oncology 601
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 390
- Pharmacology 324
Countries citing papers authored by E.M.A. Smets
This map shows the geographic impact of E.M.A. Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M.A. Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M.A. Smets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.M.A. Smets
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M.A. Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M.A. Smets. The network helps show where E.M.A. Smets may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside E.M.A. Smets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 2762 |
| 2 | 'Verkorte vermoeidheidsvragenlijst': een practisch hulpmiddel bij het scoren van vermoeidheid | 1997 | 77 |
| 3 | ['Abbreviated fatigue questionnaire': a practical tool in the classification of fatigue]. | 1997 | 77 |
| 4 | 1998 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 7 |
About E.M.A. Smets
E.M.A. Smets is a scholar working on Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Pharmacology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 5 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (370 citations), Oncology (601 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (390 citations) and Pharmacology (324 citations). E.M.A. Smets has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bert Garssen, J.C.J.M. de Haes, B. Bonke, Jan H. Vercoulen, Mark J. Alberts, Gijs Bleijenberg, Marja Visser, Nico H. Frijda and Paul Oosterveld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Rehabilitation Oncology, Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.