E.M.A. Smets

3.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

E.M.A. Smets is a scholar working on Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, E.M.A. Smets has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in E.M.A. Smets's work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers). E.M.A. Smets is often cited by papers focused on Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers). E.M.A. Smets collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. E.M.A. Smets's co-authors include Bert Garssen, J.C.J.M. de Haes, B. Bonke, Jan H. Vercoulen, Mark J. Alberts, Gijs Bleijenberg, Marja Visser, Paul Oosterveld and Nico H. Frijda and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Rehabilitation Oncology and Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank.

In The Last Decade

E.M.A. Smets

5 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue

1995 2.8k citations E.M.A. Smets, Bert Garssen et al. Journal of Psychosomatic Research profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E.M.A. Smets Netherlands	5	1.3k	601	396	390	370	5	3.0k
Ania Korszun United Kingdom	36	912 0.7×	298 0.5×	300 0.8×	259 0.7×	260 0.7×	83	3.1k
Louise Watts United Kingdom	3	1.4k 1.0×	180 0.3×	656 1.7×	200 0.5×	412 1.1×	4	2.5k
Geert Aufdemkampe Netherlands	21	793 0.6×	673 1.1×	189 0.5×	464 1.2×	134 0.4×	39	3.2k
Hongasandra Ramarao Nagendra India	35	575 0.4×	860 1.4×	204 0.5×	452 1.2×	324 0.9×	136	4.0k
J.F.M. Fennis Netherlands	21	1.4k 1.0×	172 0.3×	748 1.9×	148 0.4×	165 0.4×	35	2.6k
Raghuram Nagarathna India	43	435 0.3×	937 1.6×	244 0.6×	715 1.8×	338 0.9×	176	5.5k
Paul G. Ritvo Canada	15	1.1k 0.8×	225 0.4×	217 0.5×	303 0.8×	102 0.3×	17	3.4k
Gayle G. Page United States	28	1.3k 1.0×	335 0.6×	181 0.5×	402 1.0×	99 0.3×	63	3.7k
Arthur Peck United States	4	953 0.7×	260 0.4×	558 1.4×	149 0.4×	155 0.4×	5	2.7k
Shelly L. Curran United States	13	343 0.3×	702 1.2×	163 0.4×	451 1.2×	212 0.6×	16	1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by E.M.A. Smets

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.M.A. Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M.A. Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M.A. Smets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.M.A. Smets

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M.A. Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M.A. Smets. The network helps show where E.M.A. Smets may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.M.A. Smets

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.M.A. Smets. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.M.A. Smets based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E.M.A. Smets. E.M.A. Smets is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Smets, E.M.A., Marja Visser, Bert Garssen, et al.. (1998). Understanding the level of fatigue in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 45(3). 277–293. 44 indexed citations

2.

Alberts, Mark J., E.M.A. Smets, Jan H. Vercoulen, Bert Garssen, & Gijs Bleijenberg. (1997). 'Verkorte vermoeidheidsvragenlijst': een practisch hulpmiddel bij het scoren van vermoeidheid. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 141(31). 1526–1530. 77 indexed citations

3.

Alberts, Mark J., E.M.A. Smets, Jan H. Vercoulen, Bert Garssen, & Gijs Bleijenberg. (1997). ['Abbreviated fatigue questionnaire': a practical tool in the classification of fatigue].. PubMed. 141(31). 1526–30. 77 indexed citations

4.

Smets, E.M.A., Bert Garssen, B. Bonke, & J.C.J.M. de Haes. (1995). The multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 39(3). 315–325. 2762 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Smets, E.M.A., et al.. (1994). Fatigue in cancer patients.. Rehabilitation Oncology. 12(2). 22–22. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact