Rehabilitation Oncology

490 papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 490 papers published in Rehabilitation Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Rehabilitation Oncology usually cover Oncology (269 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (107 papers) and Surgery (105 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer survivorship and care (170 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (99 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rehabilitation Oncology are Portenoy Rk, Marjorie Kagawa‐Singer, Linda Sarna, Pratheepan Gulasekaram, Susan Leigh, Claire Davies, Paul Peter Rosen, Shana Harrington, Laura Gilchrist and Antoinette P. Sander.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rehabilitation Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rehabilitation Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rehabilitation Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Rehabilitation Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rehabilitation Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rehabilitation Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rehabilitation Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025