E.M. Wakefield

416 total citations
13 papers, 92 citations indexed

About

E.M. Wakefield is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, E.M. Wakefield has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 92 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Plant Science, 7 papers in Cell Biology and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in E.M. Wakefield's work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (7 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers). E.M. Wakefield is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (7 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers). E.M. Wakefield collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. E.M. Wakefield's co-authors include J. Ramsbottom, R. W. G. Dennis, Lorna Steel, G. R. Bisby, Ellie Owen, Mark Bolton, Andrew R. Leitch and E. J. H. Corner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Ecology, Marine Ecology Progress Series and Mycologia.

In The Last Decade

E.M. Wakefield

12 papers receiving 64 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E.M. Wakefield United Kingdom	6	54	45	20	19	14	13	92
Ernst A. Bessey United States	4	47 0.9×	35 0.8×	12 0.6×	13 0.7×	15 1.1×	4	73
Julian H. Miller United States	4	94 1.7×	108 2.4×	10 0.5×	45 2.4×	46 3.3×	10	130
P. Tsopelas Greece	6	88 1.6×	65 1.4×	35 1.8×	18 0.9×	14 1.0×	8	108
Carl D. LaRue United States	6	86 1.6×	13 0.3×	6 0.3×	32 1.7×	71 5.1×	8	128
Holly Slater United States	3	113 2.1×	24 0.5×	34 1.7×	19 1.0×	27 1.9×	6	130
Christian Scheuer Austria	5	63 1.2×	61 1.4×	9 0.5×	26 1.4×	29 2.1×	11	75
H. T. Doğmuş‐Lehtijärvi Türkiye	7	69 1.3×	66 1.5×	21 1.1×	16 0.8×	21 1.5×	17	92
Ruth Stocking Lynch United States	4	176 3.3×	20 0.4×	3 0.1×	28 1.5×	73 5.2×	4	219
Tatiana Bulyonkova Russia	5	40 0.7×	16 0.4×	20 1.0×	30 1.6×	17 1.2×	15	79
Francis Martin France	4	100 1.9×	10 0.2×	38 1.9×	12 0.6×	21 1.5×	5	116

Countries citing papers authored by E.M. Wakefield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.M. Wakefield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M. Wakefield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M. Wakefield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.M. Wakefield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M. Wakefield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M. Wakefield. The network helps show where E.M. Wakefield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.M. Wakefield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.M. Wakefield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.M. Wakefield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E.M. Wakefield. E.M. Wakefield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Owen, Ellie, et al.. (2019). Breeding together, feeding apart: sympatrically breeding seabirds forage in individually distinct locations. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 620. 173–183. 7 indexed citations

2.

Wakefield, E.M. & R. W. G. Dennis. (1981). Common British fungi : a guide to the more common larger Basidomycetes of the British Isles. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations

3.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1969). Tomentelloideae in the British Isles. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 53(2). 161–206. 9 indexed citations

4.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1966). Review. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 49(4). 703–704. 2 indexed citations

5.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1966). Some extra-european species of Tomentella. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 49(3). 357–362. 11 indexed citations

6.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1960). Some Species of Tomentella from North America. Mycologia. 52(6). 919–919. 3 indexed citations

7.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1960). Some Species of Tomentella from North America. Mycologia. 52(6). 919–933. 7 indexed citations

8.

Dennis, R. W. G., E.M. Wakefield, & G. R. Bisby. (1954). The nomenclature of Armillaria, hypholoma and Entoloma. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 37(1). 33–37. 4 indexed citations

9.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1954). The observer's book of common fungi. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations

10.

Wakefield, E.M. & J. Ramsbottom. (1954). Mushrooms and Toadstools. Kew Bulletin. 9(2). 250–250. 26 indexed citations

11.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1952). New or rare British Hymenomycetes (aphyllophorales). Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 35(1). 34–65. 10 indexed citations

12.

Wakefield, E.M.. (1951). Review. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 34(1). 138–139. 5 indexed citations

13.

Corner, E. J. H., et al.. (1951). Common British Fungi.. Journal of Ecology. 39(2). 430–430. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact