E.M. Noordijk

3.9k citations
50 papers · 2.8k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

E.M. Noordijk

50 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

E.M. Noordijk
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.9k
  • Oncology 1.3k
  • Genetics 424
  • Neurology 600
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 742
Replace Paul Smith with:
Paul Smith United Kingdom
R. Somers Netherlands
Woodrow Wells Canada
Alberto Banfi Italy
José Thomas Belgium
G. Vaughan Hudson United Kingdom
Lillian M. Fuller United States
Houchingue Eghbali France
R S Cox United States
G P Canellos United States
E.M. Noordijk relative to Paul Smith United Kingdom Paul Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.M. Noordijk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.M. Noordijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M. Noordijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M. Noordijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.M. Noordijk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M. Noordijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M. Noordijk. The network helps show where E.M. Noordijk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.M. Noordijk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.M. Noordijk Line = papers co-authored together E.M. Noordijk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003286
2 2003195
3 2002193
4 1989191
5 1998175
6 2004157
7 1996143
8 1999124
9 1995120
10 1988118
11 1995114
12 2001106
13 1996104
14 199080
15 199676
16 200358
17
Results of the Dutch national study of the palliative effect of irradiation using two different treatment schemes for non-small-cell lung cancer
200552
18 200249
19 200949
20 199845

About E.M. Noordijk

E.M. Noordijk is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (31 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (14 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (9 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (5 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.9k citations), Oncology (1.3k citations), Genetics (424 citations), Neurology (600 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (742 citations). E.M. Noordijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Hanneke C. Kluin‐Nelemans, José Thomas, Patrice Carde, M. Henry‐Amar, J.W.H. Leer, Augustinus D. G. Krol, Ivana Teodorović, Simone Snijder, Corrie A.M. Marijnen and P. M. Kluin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, European Journal of Cancer and Annals of Hematology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact