Elma Stephen

18 total papers · 1.1k total citations
3 papers, 96 citations indexed

About

Elma Stephen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elma Stephen has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 96 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Molecular Biology, 1 paper in Genetics and 1 paper in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Elma Stephen's work include Congenital heart defects research (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (1 paper). Elma Stephen is often cited by papers focused on Congenital heart defects research (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (1 paper). Elma Stephen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Elma Stephen's co-authors include Jennifer L. Dickson, S. Faisal Ahmed, Linda McLellan, Ishaq Abu‐Arafeh, Iain Horrocks, Marina Di Marco, Karen Naismith, Alex Baxter and Sze Choong Wong and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Disease in Childhood, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and Neuromuscular Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Elma Stephen

3 papers receiving 91 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Elma Stephen	32	27	25	21	15	3	96
Ravindranath Duggirala	27 0.8×	9 0.3×	38 1.5×	7 0.3×	13 0.9×	5	181
Jonathan Sellors	22 0.7×	24 0.9×	20 0.8×	91 4.3×	4 0.3×	3	225
Allison E. Arch	98 3.1×	10 0.4×	37 1.5×	12 0.6×	10 0.7×	5	234
Michele Naddeo	22 0.7×	54 2.0×	14 0.6×	10 0.5×	25 1.7×	8	223
A Durin	48 1.5×	27 1.0×	17 0.7×	9 0.4×	20 1.3×	5	236
Nicola Cooke	25 0.8×	6 0.2×	21 0.8×	5 0.2×	15 1.0×	4	254
Ashley V. Adams	106 3.3×	11 0.4×	58 2.3×	20 1.0×	12 0.8×	5	234
PK Nigam	22 0.7×	7 0.3×	16 0.6×	7 0.3×	43 2.9×	7	255
Rand Allingham	29 0.9×	23 0.9×	30 1.2×	104 5.0×	29 1.9×	7	231
Leanne S. Taylor	14 0.4×	7 0.3×	23 0.9×	12 0.6×	31 2.1×	3	231

Countries citing papers authored by Elma Stephen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elma Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elma Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elma Stephen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elma Stephen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elma Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elma Stephen. The network helps show where Elma Stephen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elma Stephen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elma Stephen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elma Stephen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elma Stephen. Elma Stephen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact