Elliot G. Mitchell

466 citations
20 papers · 263 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Elliot G. Mitchell

19 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Elliot G. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Applied Psychology 75
  • Human-Computer Interaction 65
  • Health Informatics 7
  • General Health Professions 94
  • Health Information Management 16
Replace Joongseek Lee with:
Joongseek Lee South Korea
Leysan Nurgalieva Ireland
Silke ter Stal Netherlands
Ahmed Fadhil Italy
Ahjung Byun South Korea
Lean L Kramer Netherlands
Florian Künzler Switzerland
Marcia Nißen Switzerland
Teresa K. O’Leary United States
Peter Rasche Germany
Elliot G. Mitchell relative to Joongseek Lee South Korea Joongseek Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Joongseek Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elliot G. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elliot G. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliot G. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliot G. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elliot G. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliot G. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliot G. Mitchell. The network helps show where Elliot G. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elliot G. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elliot G. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Elliot G. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202144
2 201943
3 202139
4 201835
5 202123
6 202013
7
Visualizing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Measures for Clinicians and Patients.
201711
8 20189
9 20218
10 20207
11 20237
12 20227
13 20217
14 20203
15 20213
16 20251
17 20241
18 20211
19 20211
20 20190

About Elliot G. Mitchell

Elliot G. Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), AI in Service Interactions (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (75 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (65 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), General Health Professions (94 citations) and Health Information Management (16 citations). Elliot G. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lena Mamykina, Lisa Grossman Liu, Pooja M. Desai, Matthew E. Levine, David J. Albers, Jonathan N. Tobin, Andrea Cassells, Arlene Smaldone, Steven Feiner and Ruth Masterson Creber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Applied Clinical Informatics, Scientific Data, Current Developments in Nutrition and Journal of Vascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact