Ellesandra C. Noye
About
In The Last Decade
Ellesandra C. Noye
6 papers receiving 172 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Infectious Diseases 111
- Modeling and Simulation 61
- Clinical Psychology 37
- Epidemiology 37
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Ellesandra C. Noye
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellesandra C. Noye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellesandra C. Noye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellesandra C. Noye more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellesandra C. Noye
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellesandra C. Noye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellesandra C. Noye. The network helps show where Ellesandra C. Noye may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellesandra C. Noye
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellesandra C. Noye. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellesandra C. Noye based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellesandra C. Noye. Ellesandra C. Noye is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 99 | |
| 7 | 36 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.