Elizabeth Silvius
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.5%
- Surgery
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Hamish BrownDavid A. MitchellRalph GertlerEric A. ElsterSeth SchobelMatthew J. BradleyJonathan A. ForsbergAmy Weintrob
- Topics
- Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (2 papers)Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Silvius
7 papers receiving 549 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 435
- Surgery 226
- Developmental Neuroscience 198
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 185
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 106
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Silvius
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Silvius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Silvius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Silvius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Silvius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Silvius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Silvius. The network helps show where Elizabeth Silvius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Silvius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Silvius. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Silvius based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Silvius. Elizabeth Silvius is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Dexmedetomidine: A Novel Sedative-Analgesic Agentbreakdown → | 577 |
| 8 | 1 |
About Elizabeth Silvius
Elizabeth Silvius is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (435 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (198 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (185 citations). Elizabeth Silvius has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Hamish Brown, David A. Mitchell, Ralph Gertler, Eric A. Elster, Seth Schobel, Matthew J. Bradley, Jonathan A. Forsberg, Amy Weintrob, Timothy G. Buchman and Allan D. Kirk. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Frontiers in Immunology and Toxicon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.