Elizabeth Reed
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Health top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anita RajJay G. SilvermanMichele R. DeckerHortensia AmaroElizabeth MillerSeth L. WellesAtsushi MatsumotoJeannette R. Ickovics
- Topics
- Sex work and related issues (36 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (35 papers)Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (34 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesUgandaIndia
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Reed
92 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
- General Health Professions 1.0k
- Health 1.0k
- Clinical Psychology 682
- Epidemiology 513
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Reed. The network helps show where Elizabeth Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Reed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Reed. Elizabeth Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Confidentiality, privacy, & respect: Perspectives of female sex workers participating in HIV prevention research in Andhra Pradesh, India | 1 |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Elizabeth Reed
Elizabeth Reed is a scholar working on Health, Gender Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (36 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (35 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.0k citations), Gender Studies (409 citations) and General Health Professions (1.0k citations). Elizabeth Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Uganda and India. Frequent co-authors include Anita Raj, Jay G. Silverman, Michele R. Decker, Hortensia Amaro, Elizabeth Miller, Seth L. Welles, Atsushi Matsumoto, Jeannette R. Ickovics, Jeanne Hathaway and Trace Kershaw. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.