Elizabeth O. King
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Food Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Louis Ds. SmithMalcolm S. MitchellD L RhodenLamar CrevasseIrving J. SlotnickWilliam B. CherryJohn F. WinnH. P. R. Seeliger
- Topics
- Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers)Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers)Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineJournal of BacteriologyAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth O. King
14 papers receiving 792 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Epidemiology 299
- Endocrinology 297
- Infectious Diseases 266
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 233
- Food Science 225
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth O. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth O. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth O. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth O. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth O. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth O. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth O. King. The network helps show where Elizabeth O. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth O. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth O. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth O. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth O. King. Elizabeth O. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 179 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 146 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 91 | |
| 7 | 63 | |
| 8 | 213 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | ANIMAL diseases and human health. | 2 |
| 12 | 182 | |
| 13 | A Study of a Group of Gram Negative Bacteria Resembling the Tribe Mimeae (DeBord). | 19 |
| 14 | A test in vitro for virulence of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. | 7 |
About Elizabeth O. King
Elizabeth O. King is a scholar working on Microbiology, Endocrinology and Microbiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers) and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (56 citations), Endocrinology (297 citations) and Periodontics (114 citations). Elizabeth O. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Louis Ds. Smith, Malcolm S. Mitchell, D L Rhoden, Lamar Crevasse, Irving J. Slotnick, William B. Cherry, John F. Winn, H. P. R. Seeliger, Elizabeth I. Parsons and Roy W. Chamberlain. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Bacteriology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.