Elizabeth Liles

2.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
33 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Liles is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Liles has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Oncology, 10 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Liles's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (15 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (9 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers). Elizabeth Liles is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (15 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (9 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers). Elizabeth Liles collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. Elizabeth Liles's co-authors include Evelyn P Whitlock, Jennifer S Lin, Tracy L Beil, Rongwei Fu, Theodore R. Levin, Douglas A. Corley, Stephen Bent, Jeffrey K. Lee, Nancy Perrin and David H. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, PEDIATRICS and Medical Care.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Liles

32 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Syst... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 2014 200 400 600

Peers

Elizabeth Liles
Jack L. Finch United States
Robert G Deeter United States
Pauline Rogers United Kingdom
Karen M. Linklater United Kingdom
Elizabeth Liles
Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth Liles Elizabeth Liles (= 1×) peers Ondřej Májek

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Liles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Liles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Liles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Liles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Liles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Liles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Liles. The network helps show where Elizabeth Liles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Liles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Liles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Liles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Liles. Elizabeth Liles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
DeSilva, Malini B., Gabriela Vazquez‐Benitez, Matthew F. Daley, et al.. (2025). COVID-19 and Completion of Select Routine Childhood Vaccinations. PEDIATRICS. 155(4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Qian, Lei, Lina S. Sy, Vennis Hong, et al.. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Utilization in the Vaccine Safety Datalink: Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 10. e48159–e48159. 3 indexed citations
3.
Liles, Elizabeth, Michael C. Leo, Amanda S. Freed, et al.. (2022). ORCA, a values-based decision aid for selecting additional findings from genomic sequencing in adults: Efficacy results from a randomized trial. Genetics in Medicine. 24(8). 1664–1674. 2 indexed citations
4.
Xu, Stanley, Vennis Hong, Lina S. Sy, et al.. (2022). Changes in incidence rates of outcomes of interest in vaccine safety studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine. 40(23). 3150–3158. 9 indexed citations
5.
Irving, Stephanie A., Holly C. Groom, Matthew F. Daley, et al.. (2022). A decade of data: Adolescent vaccination in the vaccine safety datalink, 2007 through 2016. Vaccine. 40(9). 1246–1252. 1 indexed citations
6.
Liles, Elizabeth, Stephanie A. Irving, Edward A. Belongia, et al.. (2021). Incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease within the Vaccine Safety Datalink network and evaluation of association with rotavirus vaccination. Vaccine. 39(27). 3614–3620. 5 indexed citations
7.
Freed, Amanda S., Inga Gruß, Carmit K. McMullen, et al.. (2020). A decision aid for additional findings in genomic sequencing: Development and pilot testing. Patient Education and Counseling. 104(5). 960–968. 4 indexed citations
8.
Weinmann, Sheila, Stephanie A. Irving, Pradeep Koppolu, et al.. (2020). Incidence of herpes zoster among varicella-vaccinated children, by number of vaccine doses and simultaneous administration of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. Vaccine. 38(37). 5880–5884. 11 indexed citations
9.
Smith, David H., David M. Mosen, A. Gabriela Rosales, et al.. (2018). Balancing Adherence and Expense: The Cost-Effectiveness of Two-Sample vs One-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Test. Population Health Management. 22(1). 83–89. 5 indexed citations
10.
Liles, Elizabeth, Nancy Perrin, A. Gabriela Rosales, et al.. (2018). Performance of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 18(1). 509–509. 16 indexed citations
11.
Liles, Elizabeth, Jennifer L. Schneider, Adrianne C. Feldstein, et al.. (2015). Implementation challenges and successes of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. Implementation Science. 10(1). 41–41. 36 indexed citations
12.
Mosen, David M., et al.. (2013). More comprehensive discussion of CRC screening associated with higher screening.. PubMed. 19(4). 265–71. 14 indexed citations
13.
Liles, Elizabeth, Nancy Perrin, A. Gabriela Rosales, et al.. (2012). Change to FIT increased CRC screening rates: evaluation of a US screening outreach program.. PubMed. 18(10). 588–95. 33 indexed citations
14.
Mosen, David M., Adrianne C. Feldstein, Nancy Perrin, et al.. (2010). Automated Telephone Calls Improved Completion of Fecal Occult Blood Testing. Medical Care. 48(7). 604–610. 62 indexed citations
15.
Mosen, David M., Adrianne C. Feldstein, Nancy Perrin, et al.. (2010). C-A3-01: The Effect of an Automated Reminder Call Intervention on Completion of Fecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT). Clinical Medicine & Research. 8(1). 30–30. 1 indexed citations
16.
Whitlock, Evelyn P, Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth Liles, et al.. (2008). Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review. 58 indexed citations
17.
Whitlock, Evelyn P, Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth Liles, Tracy L Beil, & Rongwei Fu. (2008). Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 149(9). 638–658. 624 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Whitlock, Evelyn P, Jennifer S Lin, Elizabeth Liles, et al.. (2008). Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review [Internet]. 11 indexed citations
19.
Liles, Elizabeth & Stephen C. Woods. (1999). Anorexia nervosa as viable behaviour: extreme self-deprivation in historical context. History of Psychiatry. 10(38). 205–225. 5 indexed citations
20.
Rayburn, William F., Elizabeth Liles, H. Dix Christensen, & Malcolm Robinson. (1999). Antacids vs. antacids plus non‐prescription ranitidine for heartburn during pregnancy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 66(1). 35–37. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026