Elizabeth Gilbert

1.3k total citations
24 papers, 698 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Gilbert is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Gilbert has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 698 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Gilbert's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Elizabeth Gilbert is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Elizabeth Gilbert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Elizabeth Gilbert's co-authors include Joseph Ventura, Kenneth L. Subotnik, Keith H. Nuechterlein, Daniel Gutkind, E. Thomas Smiley, Shigehiro Oishi, Barbara A. Spellman, Dongmin Liu, Jing Luo and Zhen Wei and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Gilbert

23 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 215
  • Social Psychology 169
  • Clinical Psychology 147
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 121
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
Replace Francesco Bernardini with:
Francesco Bernardini Italy
Brendán Murphy Australia
Mark Opler United States
Karsten D. Wolf Germany
G. E. Berrios United Kingdom
Alessandro Rodolico Italy
Jia Jia Liu China
Nitin Gupta India
Fazil Alıev United States
Jonathan Williams United Kingdom
Francesco Bernardini Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Elizabeth Gilbert
Elizabeth Gilbert · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth Gilbert
Elizabeth Gilbert · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Gilbert. The network helps show where Elizabeth Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Gilbert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Gilbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Gilbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Gilbert. Elizabeth Gilbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 39
4 2
5 16
6 73
7 12
8 5
9 1
10 17
11 4
12 10
13 1
14 12
15 87
16 2
17 15
18 293
19 5
20 25

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026