Elizabeth G. Ames

33 total papers · 469 total citations
23 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth G. Ames is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth G. Ames has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Clinical Biochemistry and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth G. Ames's work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (5 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (3 papers). Elizabeth G. Ames is often cited by papers focused on Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (5 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (3 papers). Elizabeth G. Ames collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Elizabeth G. Ames's co-authors include A. M. Pappenheimer, Ronald S. Goor, Jeffrey W. Holmes, Heather L. Burrows, Michael J. Lawson, Silvia S. Blemker, Ayesha Ahmad, James R. Mickelson, Kera E. Luckritz and Richard J. Price and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Neurology and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth G. Ames

22 papers receiving 279 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Elizabeth G. Ames 128 43 39 33 29 23 288
Quancheng Kan 121 0.9× 78 1.8× 32 0.8× 26 0.8× 15 0.5× 18 331
Eleonora Leggiero 172 1.3× 20 0.5× 55 1.4× 24 0.7× 39 1.3× 16 324
Wei‐Dong Yu 117 0.9× 22 0.5× 37 0.9× 32 1.0× 15 0.5× 23 325
Adhideb Ghosh 139 1.1× 42 1.0× 26 0.7× 36 1.1× 23 0.8× 32 326
Krisztína Németh 132 1.0× 34 0.8× 13 0.3× 36 1.1× 11 0.4× 36 301
Marija Stanković 126 1.0× 21 0.5× 18 0.5× 16 0.5× 36 1.2× 28 302
Christina Lisk 149 1.2× 50 1.2× 50 1.3× 19 0.6× 26 0.9× 17 331
Haili Hu 146 1.1× 34 0.8× 17 0.4× 44 1.3× 6 0.2× 30 305
Eddie Bradley 163 1.3× 61 1.4× 34 0.9× 40 1.2× 44 1.5× 24 331
Amal F. Alshammary 101 0.8× 29 0.7× 30 0.8× 30 0.9× 20 0.7× 35 274

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth G. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth G. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth G. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth G. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth G. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth G. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth G. Ames. The network helps show where Elizabeth G. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth G. Ames

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth G. Ames. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth G. Ames based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth G. Ames. Elizabeth G. Ames is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026