Elizabeth Ford

1000 total citations
52 papers, 720 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Ford is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Ford has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 720 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Clinical Psychology, 11 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 10 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Ford's work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (9 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers). Elizabeth Ford is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (9 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers). Elizabeth Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Elizabeth Ford's co-authors include G Mageras, Charlotte Ling, K. Sidhu, K. Rosenzweig, Olivia Squire, John L. Humm, Louise Braban, Steven M. Larson, Yusuf E. Erdi and Sadek A. Nehmeh and has published in prestigious journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Biochemical Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Ford

45 papers receiving 698 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 347
  • Radiation 300
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 178
  • Clinical Psychology 128
  • Biomedical Engineering 92
Replace Karen Snyder with:
Karen Snyder United States
Alexandra Cunliffe United States
Thomas M. Brunner Germany
Kendra Harris United States
Geoff Nelson United States
Christina Schröder Germany
Maria Casado United States
Guifang Zhang China
Emily T. Vella Canada
SHELLIE M. SCOTT United States
Karen Snyder United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Elizabeth Ford
Elizabeth Ford · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth Ford
Elizabeth Ford · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Ford. The network helps show where Elizabeth Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Ford. Elizabeth Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 3
5 6
6 6
7 5
8 7
9 57
10 20
11 1
12 11
13 0
14 28
15 36
16 47
17 1
18 25
19 228
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026