This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Glancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Glancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Glancy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Glancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Glancy. The network helps show where Graham Glancy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Glancy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Glancy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Glancy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Glancy. Graham Glancy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Glancy, Graham & Michael Saini. (2009). The confluence of evidence-based practice and Daubert within the fields of forensic psychiatry and the law.. PubMed. 37(4). 438–41.6 indexed citations
8.
Glancy, Graham, et al.. (2009). The case that has psychiatrists running scared: Ahmed v. Stefaniu.. PubMed. 37(2). 250–6.1 indexed citations
9.
Glancy, Graham & John Bradford. (2007). The admissibility of expert evidence in Canada.. PubMed. 35(3). 350–6.11 indexed citations
10.
Glancy, Graham, et al.. (2002). A comparison of R. v. Stone with R. v. Parks: two cases of automatism.. PubMed. 30(4). 541–7.1 indexed citations
11.
Chaimowitz, Gary, et al.. (2002). The duty to protect.. PubMed. 47(7). suppl 1–5.5 indexed citations
Glancy, Graham, et al.. (2001). Sexual predator laws in Canada.. PubMed. 29(2). 232–7.2 indexed citations
14.
Regehr, Cheryl, et al.. (2000). Canadian landmark case: L.C. and the Attorney General for Alberta v. Brian Joseph Mills.. PubMed. 28(4). 460–4.2 indexed citations
O’Shaughnessy, Roy, Graham Glancy, & John Bradford. (1999). Canadian landmark case, Smith v. Jones, supreme court of Canada: confidentiality and privilege suffer another blow.. PubMed. 27(4). 614–20.4 indexed citations
Krueger, Richard B., John Bradford, & Graham Glancy. (1998). Report from the Committee on Sex Offenders: the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest--a brief description.. PubMed. 26(2). 277–80.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.