Elizabeth A. Flaherty

1.6k total citations
53 papers, 975 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth A. Flaherty is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth A. Flaherty has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 975 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Ecology, 13 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 10 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth A. Flaherty's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (24 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers) and Isotope Analysis in Ecology (14 papers). Elizabeth A. Flaherty is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (24 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers) and Isotope Analysis in Ecology (14 papers). Elizabeth A. Flaherty collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Malawi. Elizabeth A. Flaherty's co-authors include Merav Ben‐David, Winston P. Smith, Robert K. Swihart, J. Curtis Creighton, Shannon E. Albeke, R. Terry Bowyer, John S. Scheibe, Johanna Varner, John D. Hanson and Hayley C. Lanier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth A. Flaherty

50 papers receiving 942 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth A. Flaherty United States 13 751 176 143 141 117 53 975
Jaime R. Rau Chile 17 661 0.9× 202 1.1× 126 0.9× 159 1.1× 122 1.0× 123 879
Brian C. Weeks United States 15 580 0.8× 374 2.1× 223 1.6× 333 2.4× 288 2.5× 35 1.1k
Sara R. Morris United States 17 675 0.9× 204 1.2× 139 1.0× 290 2.1× 161 1.4× 46 1.0k
Gena C. Sbeglia United States 11 413 0.5× 279 1.6× 228 1.6× 255 1.8× 451 3.9× 17 981
Tânia Margarete Sanaiotti Brazil 21 550 0.7× 443 2.5× 187 1.3× 260 1.8× 105 0.9× 45 958
Richard Southgate Australia 17 785 1.0× 299 1.7× 190 1.3× 113 0.8× 204 1.7× 26 971
Finn Sandegren Norway 20 1.6k 2.1× 212 1.2× 142 1.0× 259 1.8× 237 2.0× 35 1.8k
Marlee A. Tucker Netherlands 12 485 0.6× 134 0.8× 209 1.5× 147 1.0× 124 1.1× 18 879
Yossi Leshem Israel 21 1.0k 1.3× 205 1.2× 182 1.3× 402 2.9× 298 2.5× 65 1.3k
Harith Farooq Mozambique 10 280 0.4× 401 2.3× 176 1.2× 381 2.7× 472 4.0× 23 973

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth A. Flaherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth A. Flaherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth A. Flaherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth A. Flaherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth A. Flaherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth A. Flaherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth A. Flaherty. The network helps show where Elizabeth A. Flaherty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth A. Flaherty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth A. Flaherty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth A. Flaherty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth A. Flaherty. Elizabeth A. Flaherty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harris, Stephen N., et al.. (2025). Diet of the Florida spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius ambarvalis) in a dry prairie ecosystem. Mammalian Biology. 105(3). 329–339.
2.
Jones, Landon R., et al.. (2024). Activity responses of a mammal community to a 17-year cicada emergence event. Journal of Mammalogy. 105(5). 1190–1199. 1 indexed citations
3.
Morin, Dana J., et al.. (2024). No evidence hunting bait increases American black bear population growth in Maine, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management. 89(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2023). Teaching Mammalogy in the 21st century: advances in undergraduate education. Journal of Mammalogy. 104(4). 655–666. 2 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Winston P. & Elizabeth A. Flaherty. (2023). Wildlife studies on the Tongass National Forest challenge essential assumptions of its wildlife conservation strategy. Journal of Wildlife Management. 87(6). 2 indexed citations
6.
Paladino, Frank V., et al.. (2022). Diet and foraging niche flexibility in green and hawksbill turtles. Marine Biology. 169(8). 12 indexed citations
7.
Swihart, Robert K., et al.. (2022). Density from pellet groups: Comparing methods for estimating dung persistence time. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 46(3). 4 indexed citations
8.
Ferreira, Christina R., et al.. (2021). Lipid profiles of Pacific green and hawksbill sea turtle plasma. 1 indexed citations
9.
González‐Bergonzoni, Ivan, et al.. (2021). The relationship between urban refuse with fecundity and nestlings' success of a generalist seabird in the Río de la Plata Estuary - Uruguay. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 173(Pt A). 113000–113000. 5 indexed citations
10.
Dizney, Laurie, Johanna Varner, Jennifer Duggan, et al.. (2020). An Introduction to the Squirrel-Net Teaching Modules. CourseSource. 7. 11 indexed citations
11.
Creighton, J. Curtis, et al.. (2020). Estimating Population Abundance of Burying Beetles Using Photo-Identification and Mark-Recapture Methods. Environmental Entomology. 50(1). 238–246. 3 indexed citations
12.
Creighton, J. Curtis, et al.. (2020). Stable isotope ecology in insects: a review. Ecological Entomology. 45(6). 1231–1246. 42 indexed citations
13.
González‐Bergonzoni, Ivan, et al.. (2019). The impact of anthropogenic food subsidies on a generalist seabird during nestling growth. The Science of The Total Environment. 687. 546–553. 17 indexed citations
14.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2019). Mentored conference experiences support students' career exploration and professional development. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 43(4). 565–575. 3 indexed citations
15.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2018). Functional and numerical responses of shrews to competition vary with mouse density. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0189471–e0189471. 12 indexed citations
16.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2017). Seasonal Foraging by Forest Mice Enhances Loss of Weed Seeds from Crop—Field Edges. Northeastern Naturalist. 24(sp8). 5–17. 6 indexed citations
17.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2017). Field Discrimination of Prairie Deer Mice and White-Footed Mice Using Morphological Characteristics. Insecta mundi. 1 indexed citations
18.
Ben‐David, Merav & Elizabeth A. Flaherty. (2012). Stable isotopes in mammalian research: a beginner's guide. Journal of Mammalogy. 93(2). 312–328. 282 indexed citations
19.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A. & Merav Ben‐David. (2010). Overlap and partitioning of the ecological and isotopic niches. Oikos. 119(9). 1409–1416. 103 indexed citations
20.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A., Shelli A. Dubay, Gregory D. Hayward, John M. Marzluff, & Jessica Bradley. (2000). The northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) as a potential predator of marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) eggs. Northwest Science. 74(4). 335–339. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026