Elisabeth M. Wever
-
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 10
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research 9
-
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 4
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 3
- Statistics and Probability top 10%
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 1
-
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 3
-
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment 1
- Co-authors
- Eveline A.M. HeijnsdijkHarry J. de KoningGerrit DraismaMonique J. RoobolAlex TsodikovRuth EtzioniRoman GulatiAngela B. Mariotto
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (3 papers)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (2 papers)The Journal of Urology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Elisabeth M. Wever
11 papers receiving 520 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 400
- Oncology 220
- Statistics and Probability 40
- Cancer Research 64
- Economics and Econometrics 63
Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth M. Wever
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth M. Wever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth M. Wever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth M. Wever more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth M. Wever
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth M. Wever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth M. Wever. The network helps show where Elisabeth M. Wever may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elisabeth M. Wever, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 127 |
About Elisabeth M. Wever
Elisabeth M. Wever is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 11 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (400 citations), Oncology (220 citations) and Statistics and Probability (40 citations). Elisabeth M. Wever has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk, Harry J. de Koning, Gerrit Draisma, Monique J. Roobol, Alex Tsodikov, Ruth Etzioni, Roman Gulati, Angela B. Mariotto, David F. Penson and Chris H. Bangma. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, The Journal of Urology, Medical Decision Making and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.