Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Oncology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Markus RadererUlrich JägerMarkus TiemannAndreas ChottGerman OttGerhard SeitzAndreas PüspökBerthold Streubel
- Topics
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (6 papers)Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (6 papers)Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyJournal of Nuclear MedicineEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott
15 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 146
- Oncology 120
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 108
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 87
- Gastroenterology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott. The network helps show where Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott. Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 152 |
About Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott
Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott is a scholar working on Nephrology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (6 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (6 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (68 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (146 citations) and Genetics (64 citations). Elisabeth Kretschmer‐Chott has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Markus Raderer, Ulrich Jäger, Markus Tiemann, Andreas Chott, German Ott, Gerhard Seitz, Andreas Püspök, Berthold Streubel, Wolfgang Fischbach and Manfred Stolte. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Nuclear Medicine and European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.