Michael Weber

18.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
503 papers, 12.7k citations indexed

About

Michael Weber is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Weber has authored 503 papers receiving a total of 12.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 161 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 113 papers in Surgery and 106 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Michael Weber's work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (49 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (47 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (39 papers). Michael Weber is often cited by papers focused on Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (49 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (47 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (39 papers). Michael Weber collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Michael Weber's co-authors include Siegfried Trattnig, Daniela Prayer, Thomas H. Helbich, Gregor Kasprian, Katja Pinker, Christian Herold, Peter Brügger, Cornelia Schaefer‐Prokop, Mathias Prokop and Wolfgang Bogner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Michael Weber

484 papers receiving 12.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Illustrated Pollen Terminology

2018 363 citations Michael Weber et al. profile →
Slow expansion of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions: pathology and 7 T magnetic resonance imaging

2016 313 citations Michael Weber, Siegfried Trattnig et al. profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Michael Weber	4.7k	2.5k	1.9k	1.6k	1.4k	503	12.7k
Patrick J. Kelly	2.8k 0.6×	3.2k 1.3×	1.8k 0.9×	703 0.4×	869 0.6×	469	17.6k
John Shepherd	1.5k 0.3×	2.5k 1.0×	2.0k 1.1×	1.3k 0.8×	890 0.6×	366	15.0k
Alan Craft	2.3k 0.5×	1.9k 0.8×	4.4k 2.3×	1.6k 1.0×	746 0.5×	178	11.2k
Yukio Miki	2.3k 0.5×	1.2k 0.5×	1.1k 0.6×	1.0k 0.6×	750 0.5×	526	9.9k
Bin Zhang	2.3k 0.5×	1.8k 0.7×	1.6k 0.9×	623 0.4×	851 0.6×	673	11.8k
Roy E. Shore	5.5k 1.2×	1.1k 0.4×	2.3k 1.2×	1.2k 0.7×	692 0.5×	228	15.9k
Burkhardt Seifert	4.1k 0.9×	6.9k 2.8×	4.7k 2.5×	1.2k 0.7×	2.0k 1.4×	585	23.4k
Alan Nevill	1.6k 0.3×	2.1k 0.8×	1.8k 0.9×	1.2k 0.7×	2.7k 1.9×	677	27.4k
Fiona J. Gilbert	4.3k 0.9×	1.0k 0.4×	2.1k 1.1×	1.6k 1.0×	785 0.6×	349	12.0k
Paul S. Albert	1.6k 0.3×	1.2k 0.5×	2.0k 1.1×	2.2k 1.4×	526 0.4×	368	18.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Weber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Weber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Weber. The network helps show where Michael Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Weber. Michael Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Weber, Michael, et al.. (2025). High-pitch photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of monoenergetic image reconstructions. European Journal of Radiology Open. 15. 100666–100666. 1 indexed citations

Schmidbauer, Victor, Michael A. Arnoldner, Michael Weber, et al.. (2025). Optimizing Imaging Parameters for Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography—Impact of Reconstruction Kernel and Slice Thickness. Tomography. 11(7). 77–77.

Weber, Michael, et al.. (2024). Breast Implants: Low Rate of Annual Check-Ups Results in Delayed Presentation of Ruptured Implants. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(21). 6545–6545.

Marik, Wolfgang, Michael Weber, Gregor Kasprian, et al.. (2024). Agreement between CT-Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Predicting Angiographic Vasospasm in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(13). 3743–3743. 1 indexed citations

Moertel, Christopher L., Angela C. Hirbe, David Viskochil, et al.. (2024). ReNeu: A pivotal phase 2b trial of mirdametinib in children and adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated symptomatic inoperable plexiform neurofibroma (PN).. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 42(16_suppl). 3016–3016. 6 indexed citations

Kerschan‐Schindl, Katharina, Peter Dovjak, B Mayr, et al.. (2023). Moderate COVID‐19 Disease Is Associated With Reduced Bone Turnover. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 38(7). 943–950. 13 indexed citations

Marik, Wolfgang, Pedro Lima Cardoso, Elisabeth Springer, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of Gliomas with Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting with PET Correlation—A Comparative Study. Cancers. 15(10). 2740–2740. 3 indexed citations

Marhold, Franz, et al.. (2022). Perioperative levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients with focus on neurocognitive functioning. BMC Neurology. 22(1). 250–250. 3 indexed citations

Schmidbauer, Victor, Michael Weber, M.C. Diogo, et al.. (2022). Synthetic MR Imaging–Based WM Signal Suppression Identifies Neonatal Brainstem Pathways in Vivo. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 43(12). 1817–1823. 3 indexed citations

10.

Schmidbauer, Victor, Michael Weber, M.C. Diogo, et al.. (2021). Mapping Human Fetal Brain Maturation In Vivo Using Quantitative MRI. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 42(11). 2086–2093. 8 indexed citations

11.

Glatter, Sarah, Gregor Kasprian, Dieter Bettelheim, et al.. (2021). Beyond Isolated and Associated: A Novel Fetal MR Imaging–Based Scoring System Helps in the Prenatal Prognostication of Callosal Agenesis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 42(4). 782–786. 5 indexed citations

12.

Schmidbauer, Victor, Michael Weber, M.C. Diogo, et al.. (2021). Impact of Prematurity on the Tissue Properties of the Neonatal Brain Stem: A Quantitative MR Approach. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 42(3). 581–589. 5 indexed citations

13.

Nemec, Ursula, Klaus Friedrich, Siegfried Trattnig, et al.. (2020). Vertebral Bone Marrow and Endplate Assessment on MR Imaging for the Differentiation of Modic Type 1 Endplate Changes and Infectious Spondylodiscitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(3). 826–826. 16 indexed citations

14.

Diogo, M.C., Michael Weber, G.M. Gruber, et al.. (2020). Comparison of the Visibility of Fetal Tooth Buds on 1.5 and 3 Tesla MRI. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(11). 3424–3424. 3 indexed citations

15.

Diogo, M.C., Sarah Glatter, Daniela Prayer, et al.. (2020). Improved neurodevelopmental prognostication in isolated corpus callosal agenesis: fetal magnetic resonance imaging‐based scoring system. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 58(1). 34–41. 18 indexed citations

16.

Diogo, M.C., Peter Brügger, G.M. Gruber, et al.. (2019). Quantitative fetal magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cystic posterior fossa malformations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 56(1). 78–85. 6 indexed citations

17.

Giraudo, Chiara, Massimo Montisci, Arianna Giorgetti, et al.. (2019). Intra-class and inter-class tool discrimination through micro-CT analysis of false starts on bone. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 134(3). 1023–1032. 8 indexed citations

18.

Mayerhoefer, Marius E., Georgios Karanikas, Kurt Kletter, et al.. (2015). Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up and Treatment Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Results of an 18F-FDG-PET/CT–Controlled Prospective Study in 64 Patients. Clinical Cancer Research. 21(11). 2506–2513. 66 indexed citations

19.

Mayerhoefer, Marius E., Georgios Karanikas, Kurt Kletter, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Pretherapeutic Assessment and Staging of Lymphoma: Results of a Prospective Study in 140 Patients. Clinical Cancer Research. 20(11). 2984–2993. 81 indexed citations

20.

Pinker, Katja, Wolfgang Bogner, Pascal Baltzer, et al.. (2014). Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors with Multiparametric 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Feasibility Study. Clinical Cancer Research. 20(13). 3540–3549. 71 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact