Eliot B. Spiess
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Luretta D. SpiessLee EhrmanHampton L. CarsonCharles M. WilkeC. C. LiMelvin M. KetchelRobert B. HellingHuifang Yu
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (21 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (15 papers)Insect behavior and control techniques (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Eliot B. Spiess
69 papers receiving 904 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 613
- Genetics 566
- Insect Science 302
- Molecular Biology 159
- Ecology 141
Countries citing papers authored by Eliot B. Spiess
This map shows the geographic impact of Eliot B. Spiess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliot B. Spiess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliot B. Spiess more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eliot B. Spiess
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliot B. Spiess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliot B. Spiess. The network helps show where Eliot B. Spiess may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eliot B. Spiess
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eliot B. Spiess. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eliot B. Spiess based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eliot B. Spiess. Eliot B. Spiess is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Przyjazne srodowisku metody uprawy roli pod ziemniaki | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Quantitative determination of growth dependent changes in the ultrastructure of freely suspended callus cells of parsley petroselinum crispum | 2 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Tissue Culture Studies on Vicia Faba:IV. Effect of growth factors on mitotic activity | 3 |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Eliot B. Spiess
Eliot B. Spiess is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (21 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (15 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (613 citations), Insect Science (302 citations) and Genetics (566 citations). Eliot B. Spiess has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Luretta D. Spiess, Lee Ehrman, Hampton L. Carson, Charles M. Wilke, C. C. Li, Melvin M. Ketchel, Robert B. Helling, Huifang Yu, Hanna Klikocka and Peter O’Donald. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The American Naturalist and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.