Elin McCready
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 8
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 4
- Philosophy top 5%
- Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 2
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 5
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology 1
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 3
- Natural Language Processing Techniques 3
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 2
- Journals
- Linguistics and Philosophy (3 papers)Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (1 paper)Natural Language Semantics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Elin McCready
14 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Language and Linguistics 244
- Philosophy 97
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
- Linguistics and Language 34
- Communication 29
Countries citing papers authored by Elin McCready
This map shows the geographic impact of Elin McCready's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elin McCready with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elin McCready more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elin McCready
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elin McCready. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elin McCready. The network helps show where Elin McCready may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Elin McCready, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | The Semantics and Pragmatics of Honorification: Register and Social Meaning | 2019 | 4 |
| 7 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 148 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 84 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 2 |
About Elin McCready
Elin McCready is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Linguistics and Language and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 14 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (8 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (2 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (244 citations), Philosophy (97 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations), Linguistics and Language (34 citations) and Communication (29 citations). Elin McCready has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Davis, David Y. Oshima, Robert Henderson and Grégoire Winterstein. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistics and Philosophy, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Natural Language Semantics, Journal of Pragmatics and Grazer Philosophische Studien.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.