Elias Deeba
- Modeling and Simulation top 1%
- Numerical Analysis top 5%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sami KhuriA. de KorvinGhassan DibehPrasanna K. SahooPlamen SimeonovSuheil KhuriAhmed I. Zayed
- Topics
- Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (9 papers)Functional Equations Stability Results (9 papers)Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Computational PhysicsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy SystemsJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaLebanon
In The Last Decade
Elias Deeba
31 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Modeling and Simulation 273
- Numerical Analysis 212
- Applied Mathematics 188
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 110
- Statistics and Probability 87
Countries citing papers authored by Elias Deeba
This map shows the geographic impact of Elias Deeba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elias Deeba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elias Deeba more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elias Deeba
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elias Deeba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elias Deeba. The network helps show where Elias Deeba may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elias Deeba
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elias Deeba. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elias Deeba based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elias Deeba. Elias Deeba is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | A survey of the theory of functional equations of volterra type | 1 |
About Elias Deeba
Elias Deeba is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Theoretical Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (9 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (9 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (273 citations), Numerical Analysis (212 citations) and Applied Mathematics (188 citations). Elias Deeba has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Sami Khuri, A. de Korvin, Ghassan Dibeh, Prasanna K. Sahoo, Plamen Simeonov, Suheil Khuri and Ahmed I. Zayed. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.