Elaine P. Parrish
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- David R. GarrodRoy O. WellerRuth AlcoladoP. V. SteartDerek L. MatteyDennis H. WrightM.J. VilelaDavid A. Williamson
- Topics
- Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers)Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers)Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Cell ScienceThe Journal of Pathology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Elaine P. Parrish
10 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Biology 175
- Cell Biology 132
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 69
- Neurology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Elaine P. Parrish
This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine P. Parrish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine P. Parrish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine P. Parrish more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine P. Parrish
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine P. Parrish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine P. Parrish. The network helps show where Elaine P. Parrish may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elaine P. Parrish
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elaine P. Parrish. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elaine P. Parrish based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elaine P. Parrish. Elaine P. Parrish is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Senior Surfing: Computer Use, Aging, and Formal Training | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 165 | |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 104 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 52 |
About Elaine P. Parrish
Elaine P. Parrish is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Immunology and Allergy and Microbiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (51 citations), Cell Biology (132 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations). Elaine P. Parrish has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include David R. Garrod, Roy O. Weller, Ruth Alcolado, P. V. Steart, Derek L. Mattey, Dennis H. Wright, M.J. Vilela, David A. Williamson, Gerald M. Edelman and Elise Peltékian. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Cell Science and The Journal of Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.