E.K. Visser

36 papers receiving 2.0k citations

E.K. Visser's Hit Papers

Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review 2006 · 539 citations
5390+6+13Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

E.K. Visser
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Equine 1.2k
  • Small Animals 1.3k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 717
  • Speech and Hearing 243
  • Genetics 792
Replace Michela Minero with:
Michela Minero Italy
Natalie Waran United Kingdom
Janne Winther Christensen Denmark
Léa Lansade France
Séverine Henry France
Matthijs B.H. Schilder Netherlands
Uta König von Borstel Germany
Sue M. McDonnell United States
Markus Stauffacher Switzerland
Jan Ladewig Denmark
E.K. Visser relative to Michela Minero Italy Michela Minero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michela Minero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.K. Visser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.K. Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.K. Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.K. Visser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.K. Visser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.K. Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.K. Visser. The network helps show where E.K. Visser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.K. Visser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.K. Visser Line = papers co-authored together E.K. Visser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review
Hit paper breakdown →
2006539
2 2002273
3 2007257
4 2001182
5 2008129
6 201787
7 201280
8 200375
9 200867
10 200358
11 200355
12 200953
13 201251
14 201346
15 201138
16 201722
17 201621
18 201020
19 201220
20 201611

About E.K. Visser

E.K. Visser is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Speech and Hearing and Cell Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (23 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (17 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (6 papers), Sports Performance and Training (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (3 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (1.2k citations), Small Animals (1.3k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (717 citations), Speech and Hearing (243 citations) and Genetics (792 citations). E.K. Visser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include C.G. van Reenen, H.J. Blokhuis, A. Barneveld, Matthijs B.H. Schilder, Robert B. Jones, M. V. Tosi, Andrew M. Janczak, Xavier Boivin, Vivi Pedersen and Susanne Waiblinger. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Animal Welfare, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A – Animal Science, Animals and Journal of Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact