Eileen E. Ming

13 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Eileen E. Ming
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Family Practice 23
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 140
  • Surgery 378
  • Pharmacology 144
Replace Dagmara Hering with:
Dagmara Hering Poland
Markus Laimer Switzerland
Michael Gaffney United States
Victoria Zarotsky United States
Uta Ferrari Germany
Rebecca M. Evans United States
David Pittrow Germany
Siddhesh Kamat United States
Pierre M. Bet Netherlands
Jane T. Hickok United States
Eileen E. Ming relative to Dagmara Hering Poland Dagmara Hering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Dagmara Hering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eileen E. Ming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen E. Ming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen E. Ming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen E. Ming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen E. Ming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen E. Ming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen E. Ming. The network helps show where Eileen E. Ming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eileen E. Ming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eileen E. Ming Line = papers co-authored together Eileen E. Ming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002299
2 2006265
3 2012203
4 2004177
5 201692
6 201055
7 200453
8 200649
9 200045
10 200838
11 20098
12 20065
13
Abstract 12055: Prevalence of Lipid Abnormalities in the United States: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006
20101

About Eileen E. Ming

Eileen E. Ming is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Rheumatology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (4 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper) and Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (23 citations), Biological Psychiatry (31 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (140 citations), Surgery (378 citations) and Pharmacology (144 citations). Eileen E. Ming has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Leona E. Markson, Peter P. Tóth, Enid M. Hunkeler, Scott Bull, Danielle Potter, Xue‐Jin Hu, Henry Hu, Carl A. de Moor, Peter D. Eisenberg and Lorenzo Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Journal of clinical lipidology, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Circulation and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact