Eiji Hirata
- Plant Science top 5%
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 36
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology 7
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Nephrology top 5%
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 26
- Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions 4
-
- Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds 10
-
- Forest ecology and management 7
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 4
-
- Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Yoshio TakedaHideaki OtsukaXiaoniu XuAnki TakushiTakakazu ShinzatoToshinori IdeMasayuki IwanoKazuhiro Dohi
- Partner nations
- JapanChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eiji Hirata
73 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Plant Science 757
- Biochemistry 115
- Pharmacology 157
- Biochemistry 122
- Nephrology 106
Countries citing papers authored by Eiji Hirata
This map shows the geographic impact of Eiji Hirata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eiji Hirata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eiji Hirata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eiji Hirata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eiji Hirata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eiji Hirata. The network helps show where Eiji Hirata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eiji Hirata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 7 | [Eco-hydrological characteristics of a subtropical evergreen broadleaved forest in Japan]. | 2006 | 3 |
| 8 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 18 | |
| 14 | New Sesquiterpene Glucosides from Crepidiastrum lanceolatum | 2002 | 2 |
| 15 | A New Phenylpropanoid-Glycerol Conjugate from Helitiera littoralis Dryand | 2000 | 1 |
| 16 | 2000 | 45 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 50 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 32 | |
| 20 | イタジイ林の更新 1. 天然林の階層構造と年齢構造(演習林) | 1986 | 0 |
About Eiji Hirata
Eiji Hirata is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pharmacology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (36 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (26 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (10 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (7 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers) and Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (757 citations), Biochemistry (115 citations) and Pharmacology (157 citations). Eiji Hirata has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yoshio Takeda, Hideaki Otsuka, Xiaoniu Xu, Anki Takushi, Takakazu Shinzato, Toshinori Ide, Masayuki Iwano, Kazuhiro Dohi, Toshiya Masuda and Yoshihiro Tokashiki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.