E.F. Domino
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Papers in
-
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 4
-
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 3
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 1
- Co-authors
- Guenter Corssen (1 shared paper)Peter Chodoff (1 shared paper)Stephen E. Johnson (1 shared paper)A. Bartolini (2 shared papers)Ann Wilson (1 shared paper)Xiaojuan Xu (1 shared paper)Larry M. Weisenthal (1 shared paper)Hideo Tsukada (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuropharmacology (3 papers)Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (2 papers)Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2 papers)Trends in Neurosciences (1 paper)Clinica Chimica Acta (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
E.F. Domino
10 papers receiving 781 citations
E.F. Domino's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Biological Psychiatry 124
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 169
- Pharmacology 340
- Developmental Neuroscience 76
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 323
Countries citing papers authored by E.F. Domino
This map shows the geographic impact of E.F. Domino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.F. Domino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.F. Domino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.F. Domino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.F. Domino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.F. Domino. The network helps show where E.F. Domino may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside E.F. Domino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pharmacologic effects of CI‐581, a new dissociative anesthetic, in man Hit paper breakdown → | 1965 | 541 |
| 2 | 2001 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1971 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1962 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1973 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1972 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 2 |
About E.F. Domino
E.F. Domino is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Organic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (1 paper), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (124 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (169 citations), Pharmacology (340 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (76 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (323 citations). E.F. Domino has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Guenter Corssen, Peter Chodoff, Stephen E. Johnson, A. Bartolini, Ann Wilson, Xiaojuan Xu, Larry M. Weisenthal and Hideo Tsukada. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropharmacology, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Trends in Neurosciences and Clinica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.