Edwin Vermulst

39 papers receiving 148 citations

Peers

Edwin Vermulst
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 142
  • Political Science and International Relations 135
  • Strategy and Management 73
  • Development 14
  • Law 22
Replace David Palmeter with:
David Palmeter United States
Juan A. Marchetti Switzerland
Michael P. Leidy United States
Kent Jones United States
Deborah Z. Cass United Kingdom
Mustapha Sadni Jallab Ethiopia
Jürgen Finger United States
Youri Devuyst Belgium
Baybars Karacaovali United States
Antonia Eliason United States
Edwin Vermulst relative to David Palmeter United States David Palmeter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David Palmeter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Vermulst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Vermulst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Vermulst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Vermulst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Vermulst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Vermulst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Vermulst. The network helps show where Edwin Vermulst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Vermulst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Vermulst Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Vermulst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201320
2 200916
3 199114
4 201112
5 199212
6 20149
7
E.C. anti-dumping law and practice
19969
8
Antidumping Law and Practice in the United States and the European Communities: A Comparative Analysis
19879
9 20058
10 20157
11 20077
12 20056
13 19905
14 19974
15
Rules of Origin in International Trade
19944
16
EC Customs Classification Rules: Should Ice Cream Melt?
19943
17 20123
18 19973
19 20053
20 19983

About Edwin Vermulst

Edwin Vermulst is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Law, Strategy and Management and Accounting, having authored 52 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include World Trade Organization Law (32 papers), Global trade and economics (22 papers), EU Law and Policy Analysis (12 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (9 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (8 papers), European and International Law Studies (8 papers), Law, logistics, and international trade (4 papers) and Corporate Governance and Law (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (142 citations), Political Science and International Relations (135 citations), Strategy and Management (73 citations), Development (14 citations) and Law (22 citations). Edwin Vermulst has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Prusa, Simon J. Evenett, Petros C. Mavroidis and P. K. Mathew Tharakan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of World Trade, World Trade Review, World Economy, European Journal of International Law and Global Trade and Customs Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact