Edwin H. Bryant

2.6k total citations
82 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Edwin H. Bryant is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Edwin H. Bryant has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 32 papers in Genetics and 31 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Edwin H. Bryant's work include Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (21 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (12 papers). Edwin H. Bryant is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (21 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (12 papers). Edwin H. Bryant collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Edwin H. Bryant's co-authors include Lisa M. Meffert, Steven A. McCommas, David H. Reed, Birgitta Sillén‐Tullberg, Robert R. Sokal, Stacey B. Day, Vickie L. Backus, W. van Delden, Henk van Dijk and Kay T. Kimball and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Ecology and Technometrics.

In The Last Decade

Edwin H. Bryant

80 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edwin H. Bryant United States 26 1.2k 991 496 468 355 82 2.1k
J. M. Cherrett United Kingdom 30 1.6k 1.4× 1.6k 1.6× 1.1k 2.1× 393 0.8× 310 0.9× 58 2.5k
Christine R. B. Boake United States 24 981 0.8× 1.6k 1.6× 457 0.9× 350 0.7× 201 0.6× 44 2.1k
Cristina P. Sandoval United States 16 1.0k 0.9× 1.0k 1.0× 258 0.5× 323 0.7× 333 0.9× 23 1.6k
Denis F. Owen United Kingdom 27 671 0.5× 1.3k 1.4× 559 1.1× 804 1.7× 735 2.1× 127 2.3k
C. N. Slobodchikoff United States 25 547 0.4× 1.0k 1.0× 283 0.6× 1.2k 2.5× 478 1.3× 62 2.3k
Yoshitaka Tsubaki Japan 23 653 0.5× 1.4k 1.4× 585 1.2× 381 0.8× 387 1.1× 66 1.8k
Peter Crnokrak Canada 12 1.6k 1.3× 1.4k 1.4× 283 0.6× 732 1.6× 596 1.7× 12 2.7k
Jeanne A. Zeh United States 27 1.2k 1.0× 1.8k 1.8× 414 0.8× 594 1.3× 332 0.9× 49 2.7k
Russell E. Naisbit Switzerland 19 976 0.8× 1.5k 1.5× 488 1.0× 361 0.8× 511 1.4× 30 2.0k
Wilhelm Fortelius Finland 9 1.1k 0.9× 736 0.7× 196 0.4× 656 1.4× 431 1.2× 12 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin H. Bryant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin H. Bryant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin H. Bryant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin H. Bryant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin H. Bryant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin H. Bryant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin H. Bryant. The network helps show where Edwin H. Bryant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin H. Bryant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin H. Bryant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin H. Bryant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin H. Bryant. Edwin H. Bryant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Day, Stacey B., Edwin H. Bryant, & Lisa M. Meffert. (2003). THE INFLUENCE OF VARIABLE RATES OF INBREEDING ON FITNESS, ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIVENESS, AND EVOLUTIONARY POTENTIAL. Evolution. 57(6). 1314–1324. 61 indexed citations
2.
Reed, David H. & Edwin H. Bryant. (2001). Fitness, genetic load and purging in experimental populations of the housefly. Conservation Genetics. 2(1). 57–61. 36 indexed citations
3.
Reed, David H. & Edwin H. Bryant. (2000). The evolution of senescence under curtailed life span in laboratory populations of Musca domestica (the housefly). Heredity. 85(2). 115–121. 20 indexed citations
4.
Bryant, Edwin H. & Lisa M. Meffert. (1998). Quantitative Genetic Estimates of Morphometric Variation in Wild-Caught and Laboratory-Reared Houseflies. Evolution. 52(2). 626–626. 4 indexed citations
5.
Backus, Vickie L., Edwin H. Bryant, Colin Hughes, & Lisa M. Meffert. (1995). Effect of Migration or Inbreeding Followed by Selection on Low‐Founder‐Number Populations: Implications for Captive Breeding Programs. Conservation Biology. 9(5). 1216–1224. 27 indexed citations
6.
Backus, Vickie L., Edwin H. Bryant, Colin Hughes, & Lisa M. Meffert. (1995). Effect of Migration or Inbreeding Followed by Selection on Low-Founder-Number Populations: Implications for Captive Breeding Programs. Conservation Biology. 9(5). 1216–1224. 4 indexed citations
7.
Meffert, Lisa M. & Edwin H. Bryant. (1992). Divergent Ambulatory and Grooming Behavior in Serially Bottlenecked Lines of the Housefly. Evolution. 46(5). 1399–1399. 7 indexed citations
8.
McCommas, Steven A. & Edwin H. Bryant. (1990). Loss of electrophoretic variation in serially bottlenecked populations. Heredity. 64(3). 315–321. 53 indexed citations
9.
Bryant, Edwin H. & Lisa M. Meffert. (1990). Multivariate Phenotypic Differentiation Among Bottleneck Lines of the Housefly. Evolution. 44(3). 660–660. 11 indexed citations
10.
Bryant, Edwin H., et al.. (1986). MORPHOMETRIC DIFFERENTIATION AMONG EXPERIMENTAL LINES OF THE HOUSEFLY IN RELATION TO A BOTTLENECK. Genetics. 114(4). 1213–1223. 38 indexed citations
11.
Bryant, Edwin H.. (1986). Do Flies Adapt?. Evolution. 40(1). 207–207. 1 indexed citations
12.
Bryant, Edwin H.. (1984). A Comparison of Electrophoretic and Morphometric Variability in the Face Fly, Musca autumnalis. Evolution. 38(2). 455–455. 2 indexed citations
13.
Bryant, Edwin H., et al.. (1981). Effect of Size Upon Mating Performance Within Geographic Strains of the Housefly, Musca domestica L.. Evolution. 35(6). 1134–1134. 4 indexed citations
14.
Bryant, Edwin H., et al.. (1980). A RARE-MALE ADVANTAGE IN THE HOUSEFLY INDUCED BY WING CLIPPING AND SOME GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR DROSOPHILA. Genetics. 96(4). 975–993. 36 indexed citations
15.
Bryant, Edwin H.. (1979). Inbreeding and heterogamic mating: An alternative to Averhoff and Richardson. Behavior Genetics. 9(4). 249–256. 11 indexed citations
16.
Atchley, William R., et al.. (1976). Multivariate Statistical Methods: Among-Groups Covariation. Technometrics. 18(2). 241–241. 16 indexed citations
17.
Bryant, Edwin H.. (1976). A COMMENT ON THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION IN MAINTAINING POLYMORPHISMS IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. Evolution. 30(1). 188–190. 24 indexed citations
18.
Bryant, Edwin H.. (1969). A model of population fitness and the maintenance of genetic polymorphism when two ecological patches are available. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 31(4). 669–680. 2 indexed citations
19.
Bryant, Edwin H.. (1969). The Fates of Immatures in Mixtures of Two Housefly Strains. Ecology. 50(6). 1049–1069. 37 indexed citations
20.
Bryant, Edwin H. & Robert R. Sokal. (1968). Genetic differences affecting the fates of immature housefly populations at two densities. Population Ecology. 10(2). 140–170. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026