Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems
19671.9k citationsEdwin G. Boring et al.The American Journal of Psychologyprofile →
The perception of the visual world.
1951555 citationsEdwin G. BoringPsychological Bulletinprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin G. Boring
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin G. Boring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin G. Boring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin G. Boring more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin G. Boring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin G. Boring. The network helps show where Edwin G. Boring may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin G. Boring
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin G. Boring.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin G. Boring based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin G. Boring. Edwin G. Boring is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boring, Edwin G., et al.. (1968). Important psychologists, 1600–1967. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 4(4). 303–315.50 indexed citations
2.
Boring, Edwin G.. (1967). Titchener's Experimentalists. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 3(4). 315–325.15 indexed citations
3.
Herrnstein, R. J. & Edwin G. Boring. (1965). A source book in the history of psychology. Harvard University Press eBooks.147 indexed citations
4.
Boring, Edwin G., et al.. (1963). History, psychology, and science: selected papers.. J. Wiley eBooks.73 indexed citations
Boring, Edwin G.. (1953). Elementist Going Up. (Book Reviews: The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology). 76(3). 182–183.
Boring, Edwin G.. (1951). The book review.. PubMed. 64(2). 281–3.6 indexed citations
20.
Edwards, Ward & Edwin G. Boring. (1951). What Is Emmert's Law?. The American Journal of Psychology. 64(3). 416–416.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.