Edward J. Lincoln
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Richard J. KatzRichard N. CooperDonald S. ZagoriaBenjamin M. FriedmanLeonard J. SchoppaRobert E. LitanRyūtarō KomiyaRonald Dore
- Topics
- Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (4 papers)Japanese History and Culture (3 papers)International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Edward J. Lincoln
27 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Political Science and International Relations 145
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 108
- Finance 95
- Economics and Econometrics 93
- Sociology and Political Science 73
Countries citing papers authored by Edward J. Lincoln
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward J. Lincoln's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward J. Lincoln with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward J. Lincoln more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward J. Lincoln
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward J. Lincoln. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward J. Lincoln. The network helps show where Edward J. Lincoln may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward J. Lincoln
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward J. Lincoln. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward J. Lincoln based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward J. Lincoln. Edward J. Lincoln is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Japan and the Middle East | 0 |
| 15 | Japan's unequal trade | 42 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Edward J. Lincoln
Edward J. Lincoln is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Development and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 36 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (47 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (108 citations) and Finance (95 citations). Edward J. Lincoln has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Katz, Richard N. Cooper, Donald S. Zagoria, Benjamin M. Friedman, Leonard J. Schoppa, Robert E. Litan, Ryūtarō Komiya, Ronald Dore, Harry Harding and Michael L. Gerlach. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.