Edward Harcourt
- Philosophy top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Julie DaviesNadeem HussainBernard ReginsterLawrence J. HatabDavid Crepaz‐KeayPaul KatsafanasBrian LeiterRaymond Geuss
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Edward Harcourt
26 papers receiving 109 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Philosophy 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 36
- Sociology and Political Science 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
- Political Science and International Relations 17
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Harcourt
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Harcourt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Harcourt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Harcourt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Harcourt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Harcourt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Harcourt. The network helps show where Edward Harcourt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward Harcourt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward Harcourt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward Harcourt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward Harcourt. Edward Harcourt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Edward Harcourt
Edward Harcourt is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 125 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (71 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (36 citations). Edward Harcourt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julie Davies, Nadeem Hussain, Bernard Reginster, Lawrence J. Hatab, David Crepaz‐Keay, Paul Katsafanas, Brian Leiter, Raymond Geuss, Christine Swanton and R. Lanier Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.