Edward H. Spicer
- Anthropology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 1%
- Co-authors
- Erik K. ReedRalph A. LuebbenJack D. ForbesWilliam L. MerrillGertrude P. KurathFred EgganRaymond H. ThompsonVictor M. Rios
- Topics
- Latin American history and culture (7 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (5 papers)Latin American and Latino Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward H. Spicer
34 papers receiving 623 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Anthropology 291
- Sociology and Political Science 264
- Cultural Studies 117
- Political Science and International Relations 116
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 106
Countries citing papers authored by Edward H. Spicer
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward H. Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward H. Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward H. Spicer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward H. Spicer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward H. Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward H. Spicer. The network helps show where Edward H. Spicer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward H. Spicer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward H. Spicer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward H. Spicer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward H. Spicer. Edward H. Spicer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los yaquis . Historia de una cultura | 20 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | The American Indians | 8 |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | Potam : A Yaqui Village in Sonora | 11 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 139 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Edward H. Spicer
Edward H. Spicer is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 35 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American history and culture (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (5 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (291 citations), Archeology (24 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (106 citations). Edward H. Spicer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Erik K. Reed, Ralph A. Luebben, Jack D. Forbes, William L. Merrill, Gertrude P. Kurath, Fred Eggan, Raymond H. Thompson, Victor M. Rios, Julian Samora and Donald E. Worcester. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.