Edward H. Hinchcliffe

2.9k citations
63 papers · 2.3k indexed · h-index 22
  • Cell Biology top 0.5%
    • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 32
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 10
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 9
    • Protist diversity and phylogeny 7
  • Oncology top 5%
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 7
  • Aging top 10%
  • Biophysics top 5%
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 8
    • Cell Image Analysis Techniques 8
    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 6

Edward H. Hinchcliffe

61 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Edward H. Hinchcliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cell Biology 1.6k
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Oncology 495
  • Aging 31
  • Biophysics 78
Replace Paul D. Andrews with:
Paul D. Andrews United Kingdom
Derek F. Ceccarelli Canada
Florence Poy United States
Alwin Köhler Austria
Mark Jackman United Kingdom
Louise Evans United States
Jan‐Michael Peters Austria
Haruhiko Takisawa Japan
Daniel Fisher France
Michael J. Emanuele United States
Edward H. Hinchcliffe relative to Paul D. Andrews United Kingdom Paul D. Andrews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Paul D. Andrews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward H. Hinchcliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward H. Hinchcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward H. Hinchcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward H. Hinchcliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward H. Hinchcliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward H. Hinchcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward H. Hinchcliffe. The network helps show where Edward H. Hinchcliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward H. Hinchcliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward H. Hinchcliffe Line = papers co-authored together Edward H. Hinchcliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20234
3 202025
4 20192
5 201143
6 201011
7 200825
8 200855
9 20073
10 200711
11 20070
12 200612
13 20032
14 20034
15 20039
16 200264
17 200127
18 200039
19 199918
20 199818

About Edward H. Hinchcliffe

Edward H. Hinchcliffe is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (32 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (10 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (9 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (8 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (8 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (7 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (7 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (1.6k citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations) and Oncology (495 citations). Edward H. Hinchcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Greenfield Sluder, E. A. Thompson, Chuan Li, James L. Maller, Frederick J. Miller, Matthew D. Cham, Alexey Khodjakov, Kevin T. Vaughan, Jessica E. Hornick and Rhoderick E. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026