Edward Conzé

42 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Edward Conzé
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Religious studies 177
  • Philosophy 135
  • Anthropology 58
  • General Psychology 5
  • Sociology and Political Science 166
Replace Eliot Deutsch with:
Eliot Deutsch United States
Elaine H. Pagels United States
Richard Gombrich United Kingdom
Lauri Honko Finland
Paul J. Griffiths United States
Johannes Bronkhorst Switzerland
Henry Corbin United States
Moshe Greenberg Israel
Paula Richman United States
David Kinsley Canada
Edward Conzé relative to Eliot Deutsch United States Eliot Deutsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Eliot Deutsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Conzé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Conzé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Conzé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Conzé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Conzé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Conzé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Conzé. The network helps show where Edward Conzé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Edward Conzé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Conzé Line = papers co-authored together Edward Conzé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195278
2 196749
3 195431
4 198229
5
The Cultural Heritage of India
195827
6
Buddhist Thought in India: Three Phases of Buddhist Philosophy
196227
7 197426
8 195220
9 196914
10
Buddhist Wisdom Books: Containing "The Diamond Sutra" and "The Heart Sutra"
195812
11 197811
12 19769
13
The Prajñāpāramitā Literature
19609
14 19579
15 19558
16
Selected sayings from the Perfection of Wisdom
19688
17 19637
18 19637
19 19617
20 19696

About Edward Conzé

Edward Conzé is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 57 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (42 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (13 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (13 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (7 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (177 citations), Philosophy (135 citations), Anthropology (58 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (166 citations). Edward Conzé has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Hajime Nakamura, Donald W. Mitchell, Arthur Waley, D. L. Snellgrove, Alex Wayman, Daisetsu Teitaro Suzuki, Paul W. Kroll, D. Seyfort Ruegg, Robert Slater and J. C. Heesterman. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Pacific Affairs, The Journal of Philosophy, Religion and Journal of the American Oriental Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact