Eduard M. Scholten

558 citations
9 papers · 473 indexed · h-index 7

Eduard M. Scholten

9 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Eduard M. Scholten
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Transplantation 393
  • Nephrology 60
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 153
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 114
  • Hepatology 32
Replace R. Panek with:
R. Panek Canada
A.-É. Heng France
Neumayer Hh Germany
Maciej Głyda Poland
David Schladt United States
David H. Van Buren United States
Timothy J. Schroeder United States
F. Villemain France
W. Guan United States
Thomas Vanhove Belgium
Eduard M. Scholten relative to R. Panek Canada R. Panek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
R. Panek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eduard M. Scholten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eduard M. Scholten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eduard M. Scholten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eduard M. Scholten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eduard M. Scholten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eduard M. Scholten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eduard M. Scholten. The network helps show where Eduard M. Scholten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Eduard M. Scholten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eduard M. Scholten Line = papers co-authored together Eduard M. Scholten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 200659
2 200658
3 200581
4 200575
5 2005137
6 20047
7 200350
8 20022
9
Ischemia and long-term reperfusion injury in a one-stage orthotopic rat small bowel transplantation model: when and where to biopsy?
19924

About Eduard M. Scholten

Eduard M. Scholten is a scholar working on Transplantation, Nephrology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (9 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (2 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (2 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (393 citations), Nephrology (60 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (153 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (114 citations) and Hepatology (32 citations). Eduard M. Scholten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Johan W. de Fijter, Leendert C. Paul, Rik C. Schoemaker, Jan den Hartigh, Ajda T. Rowshani, Serge C.L.M. Cremers, Sandrine Florquin, Fréderike J. Bemelman, Michael Eikmans and Ingeborg M. Bajema. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Kidney International, Transplantation Reviews, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026