Ednita M. Wright

553 citations
7 papers · 482 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Ednita M. Wright

7 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Ednita M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • General Health Professions 368
  • Infectious Diseases 228
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Health 57
  • Gender Studies 56
Replace Seth C. Kalichman with:
Seth C. Kalichman United States
Chwee Lye Chng United States
Sally Lehr United States
Diane Civic United States
Jill Gurvey United States
Dolores Simpson United States
James B. Shepherd United States
Lauren E. Durant United States
Roger D. Vaughan United States
Lilly M. Langer United States
Ednita M. Wright relative to Seth C. Kalichman United States Seth C. Kalichman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Seth C. Kalichman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ednita M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ednita M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ednita M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ednita M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ednita M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ednita M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ednita M. Wright. The network helps show where Ednita M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Ednita M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ednita M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Ednita M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1997194
2 1997162
3 200142
4 201033
5 200527
6
African American women and HIV/AIDS : critical responses
200322
7
Deep from within the well: African-American women living with AIDS
19952

About Ednita M. Wright

Ednita M. Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Safety Research, Infectious Diseases, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Social Work Education and Practice (1 paper) and Research in Social Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (368 citations), Infectious Diseases (228 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Health (57 citations) and Gender Studies (56 citations). Ednita M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Forsyth, Blair T. Johnson, Kate B. Carey, Seth C. Kalichman, Seth C. Kalichman, Stephen A. Maisto, Michael P. Carey, Diane S. Young, Lori A. J. Scott‐Sheldon and Mindy Thompson Fullilove. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Social Work Education, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Family & Community Health and DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact