Edna Acosta‐Belén

650 total citations
13 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

Edna Acosta‐Belén is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Edna Acosta‐Belén has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cultural Studies, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Edna Acosta‐Belén's work include Latin American and Latino Studies (8 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers) and Latin American Literature Studies (1 paper). Edna Acosta‐Belén is often cited by papers focused on Latin American and Latino Studies (8 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers) and Latin American Literature Studies (1 paper). Edna Acosta‐Belén collaborates with scholars based in United States. Edna Acosta‐Belén's co-authors include Christine E. Bose, Laura T. Raynolds and Susan Tiano and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Gender & Society and Signs.

In The Last Decade

Edna Acosta‐Belén

13 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Edna Acosta‐Belén
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Sociology and Political Science 178
  • Gender Studies 85
  • Political Science and International Relations 43
  • Economics and Econometrics 38
  • Cultural Studies 36
Replace Marta López-Garza with:
Marta López-Garza United States
Leslie Gates United States
Elsa M. Chaney United States
Vérónica Schild Canada
Cristina Carrasco Bengoa Spain
Gordana Rabrenovic United States
Marianne H. Marchand Mexico
Thanh-Đạm Trương Netherlands
Caitrin Lynch United States
Penny Griffin Australia
Marta López-Garza United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Edna Acosta‐Belén
Edna Acosta‐Belén · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Edna Acosta‐Belén
Edna Acosta‐Belén · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Edna Acosta‐Belén

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Acosta‐Belén's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Acosta‐Belén with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Acosta‐Belén more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edna Acosta‐Belén

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Acosta‐Belén. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Acosta‐Belén. The network helps show where Edna Acosta‐Belén may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edna Acosta‐Belén

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edna Acosta‐Belén. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edna Acosta‐Belén based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edna Acosta‐Belén. Edna Acosta‐Belén is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 6
3 29
4 8
5 63
6 66
7
Women in the Latin American Development Process
48
8 4
9 4
10 28
11 19
12
The Puerto Rican Woman: Perspectives on Culture, History, and Society
27
13
The Puerto Rican woman
19

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026