Edith Kurzweil

155 total papers · 864 total citations
42 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Edith Kurzweil is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Edith Kurzweil has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in History. Recurrent topics in Edith Kurzweil's work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). Edith Kurzweil is often cited by papers focused on Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). Edith Kurzweil collaborates with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Edith Kurzweil's co-authors include Richard M. Harland, John Kerr, William Phillips, Paul Heyer, Robert Wuthnow, James Davison Hunter, Albert Bergesen, James V. Spickard, Barry Turner and Mari Jo Buhle and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Sociology and The American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

Edith Kurzweil

31 papers receiving 226 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Edith Kurzweil	114	67	59	56	38	42	358
Carolyn G. Heilbrun	80 0.7×	32 0.5×	35 0.6×	94 1.7×	28 0.7×	40	355
Mark Bracher	129 1.1×	48 0.7×	86 1.5×	93 1.7×	29 0.8×	40	382
Hugh J. Silverman	80 0.7×	77 1.1×	20 0.3×	51 0.9×	24 0.6×	58	300
David S. Caudill	131 1.1×	58 0.9×	107 1.8×	32 0.6×	30 0.8×	68	373
Charles B. Strozier	130 1.1×	40 0.6×	129 2.2×	27 0.5×	71 1.9×	49	356
Gary Genosko	123 1.1×	53 0.8×	23 0.4×	46 0.8×	20 0.5×	56	347
David Lapoujade	152 1.3×	106 1.6×	48 0.8×	54 1.0×	17 0.4×	20	388
Francisco de la Puerta	99 0.9×	33 0.5×	52 0.9×	17 0.3×	54 1.4×	32	386
Eli Zaretsky	238 2.1×	28 0.4×	70 1.2×	17 0.3×	42 1.1×	38	400
Philip Pomper	161 1.4×	44 0.7×	49 0.8×	17 0.3×	33 0.9×	38	374

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Kurzweil

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Kurzweil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Kurzweil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Kurzweil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Kurzweil

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Kurzweil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Kurzweil. The network helps show where Edith Kurzweil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith Kurzweil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith Kurzweil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith Kurzweil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith Kurzweil. Edith Kurzweil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact