Edith J. Liemburg
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Henderikus KnegteringAndré AlemánAns VercammenRichard BruggemanJoukje van der NaaltJacoba M. SpikmanHarm J. van der HornStynke Castelein
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (43 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (24 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Edith J. Liemburg
67 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cognitive Neuroscience 911
- Psychiatry and Mental health 715
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 329
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 326
- Clinical Psychology 225
Countries citing papers authored by Edith J. Liemburg
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith J. Liemburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith J. Liemburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith J. Liemburg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith J. Liemburg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith J. Liemburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith J. Liemburg. The network helps show where Edith J. Liemburg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith J. Liemburg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith J. Liemburg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith J. Liemburg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith J. Liemburg. Edith J. Liemburg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 155 |
About Edith J. Liemburg
Edith J. Liemburg is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (43 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (24 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (911 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (715 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (109 citations). Edith J. Liemburg has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Henderikus Knegtering, André Alemán, Ans Vercammen, Richard Bruggeman, Joukje van der Naalt, Jacoba M. Spikman, Harm J. van der Horn, Stynke Castelein, Leonie Bais and Roy E. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.