Edith Fox

575 citations
14 papers · 402 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Edith Fox

14 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

Edith Fox
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 120
  • Reproductive Medicine 112
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 306
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 159
  • General Health Professions 135
Replace Anitra Beasley with:
Anitra Beasley United States
Marie Törnbom Sweden
Leena Repokari Finland
Miri Gozlan Israel
Monique Bydlowski France
Eleonora Bielawska‐Batorowicz Poland
Laura Robertson United States
Victoria Louise Newton United Kingdom
Vania Valoriani Italy
Carmen C Pace Australia
Edith Fox relative to Anitra Beasley United States Anitra Beasley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Anitra Beasley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Fox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Fox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Fox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Fox. The network helps show where Edith Fox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Fox Line = papers co-authored together Edith Fox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201666
2 202164
3 201957
4 201851
5 201846
6 196936
7 201923
8 202316
9 202015
10 202213
11 20175
12 20154
13 20174
14 20192

About Edith Fox

Edith Fox is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (12 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (120 citations), Reproductive Medicine (112 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (306 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (159 citations) and General Health Professions (135 citations). Edith Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christine Dehlendorf, Reiley Reed, Sonya Borrero, Kelsey Holt, N. Christoff, Eric Vittinghoff, Susan Moskosky, Danielle Hessler, Jody Steinauer and Dominika Seidman. Their work appears in journals such as Contraception, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact