Edith C. Glazer

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
59 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Edith C. Glazer is a scholar working on Oncology, Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edith C. Glazer has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Oncology, 27 papers in Organic Chemistry and 17 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Edith C. Glazer's work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (25 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (15 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (10 papers). Edith C. Glazer is often cited by papers focused on Metal complexes synthesis and properties (25 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (15 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (10 papers). Edith C. Glazer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Edith C. Glazer's co-authors include David K. Heidary, Brock S. Howerton, Sean Parkin, Erin Wachter, Yitzhak Tor, Dmytro Havrylyuk, Douglas Magde, Matthew T. Dickerson, Yang Sun and Doo Young Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Edith C. Glazer

58 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated A... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edith C. Glazer United States 30 1.2k 1.2k 1.0k 638 605 59 2.7k
Nicola J. Farrer United Kingdom 20 949 0.8× 752 0.7× 806 0.8× 391 0.6× 452 0.7× 41 1.9k
Thomas W. Rees China 32 713 0.6× 1.4k 1.3× 651 0.6× 1.4k 2.2× 759 1.3× 54 2.9k
Susan Monro Canada 26 983 0.8× 1.5k 1.3× 1.0k 1.0× 1.4k 2.2× 559 0.9× 35 3.1k
Samya Banerjee India 34 1.3k 1.1× 1.7k 1.5× 1.3k 1.3× 1.2k 1.9× 860 1.4× 128 3.9k
David K. Heidary United States 21 821 0.7× 823 0.7× 735 0.7× 466 0.7× 658 1.1× 47 2.0k
Taotao Zou China 31 1.2k 1.0× 1.2k 1.0× 1.7k 1.6× 400 0.6× 576 1.0× 64 3.6k
A. Chouai United States 21 801 0.7× 692 0.6× 711 0.7× 212 0.3× 491 0.8× 26 1.9k
Ana M. Pizarro United Kingdom 31 2.3k 1.9× 843 0.7× 2.0k 2.0× 336 0.5× 764 1.3× 78 3.6k
Makoto Obata Japan 27 329 0.3× 1.2k 1.0× 1.1k 1.0× 701 1.1× 430 0.7× 93 2.5k
Luca Salassa Spain 38 2.6k 2.1× 1.9k 1.6× 2.5k 2.4× 777 1.2× 1.1k 1.8× 121 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Edith C. Glazer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith C. Glazer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith C. Glazer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith C. Glazer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith C. Glazer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith C. Glazer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith C. Glazer. The network helps show where Edith C. Glazer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith C. Glazer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith C. Glazer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith C. Glazer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith C. Glazer. Edith C. Glazer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harrison, Robert J., et al.. (2025). Photo-ejected ligands hyperpolarized by parahydrogen in reversible exchange. Chemical Communications. 61(24). 4674–4677. 2 indexed citations
2.
Mitchell, Richard J., et al.. (2024). Photodynamic therapy photosensitizers and photoactivated chemotherapeutics exhibit distinct bioenergetic profiles to impact ATP metabolism. Chemical Science. 16(2). 721–734. 6 indexed citations
3.
Havrylyuk, Dmytro, David K. Heidary, & Edith C. Glazer. (2024). The Impact of Inorganic Systems and Photoactive Metal Compounds on Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Metabolism: From Induction to Inhibition. Biomolecules. 14(4). 441–441. 3 indexed citations
4.
Mitchell, Richard J., Dmytro Havrylyuk, Ankit Pandeya, et al.. (2023). A monoadduct generating Ru( ii ) complex induces ribosome biogenesis stress and is a molecular mimic of phenanthriplatin. RSC Chemical Biology. 4(5). 344–353. 5 indexed citations
5.
Havrylyuk, Dmytro, et al.. (2022). Ru(II) photocages enable precise control over enzyme activity with red light. Nature Communications. 13(1). 3636–3636. 51 indexed citations
6.
Zamora, Ana, Erin Wachter, María del Mar Sánchez Vera, et al.. (2021). Organoplatinum(II) Complexes Self-Assemble and Recognize AT-Rich Duplex DNA Sequences. Inorganic Chemistry. 60(4). 2178–2187. 20 indexed citations
7.
Havrylyuk, Dmytro, et al.. (2018). Structure-activity relationships of anticancer ruthenium(II) complexes with substituted hydroxyquinolines. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 156. 790–799. 49 indexed citations
8.
Geronimo, Inacrist, et al.. (2018). Molecular Determinants of Substrate Affinity and Enzyme Activity of a Cytochrome P450BM3 Variant. Biophysical Journal. 115(7). 1251–1263. 8 indexed citations
9.
Kohler, Lars, et al.. (2017). Photochemical and Photobiological Activity of Ru(II) Homoleptic and Heteroleptic Complexes Containing Methylated Bipyridyl-type Ligands. Inorganic Chemistry. 56(20). 12214–12223. 42 indexed citations
10.
Zamora, Ana, et al.. (2017). Ruthenium-containing P450 inhibitors for dual enzyme inhibition and DNA damage. Dalton Transactions. 46(7). 2165–2173. 71 indexed citations
12.
Wachter, Erin, Edith C. Glazer, Sean Parkin, & C.P. Brock. (2016). An exceptional 5:4 enantiomeric structure. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science Crystal Engineering and Materials. 72(2). 223–231. 6 indexed citations
13.
Wachter, Erin, et al.. (2015). Ruthenium Complex “Light Switches” that are Selective for Different G‐Quadruplex Structures. Chemistry - A European Journal. 22(2). 550–559. 51 indexed citations
14.
Heidary, David K. & Edith C. Glazer. (2014). A Light‐Activated Metal Complex Targets both DNA and RNA in a Fluorescent in Vitro Transcription and Translation Assay. ChemBioChem. 15(4). 507–511. 16 indexed citations
15.
Wachter, Erin, David K. Heidary, Brock S. Howerton, Sean Parkin, & Edith C. Glazer. (2012). Light-activated ruthenium complexes photobind DNA and are cytotoxic in the photodynamic therapy window. Chemical Communications. 48(77). 9649–9649. 283 indexed citations
16.
Glazer, Edith C., Yen Nguyen, Harry B. Gray, & David B. Goodin. (2007). Probing Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase with a Pterin–Ruthenium(II) Sensitizer Wire. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 47(5). 898–901. 11 indexed citations
17.
Glazer, Edith C., Yen Nguyen, Harry B. Gray, & David B. Goodin. (2007). Probing Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase with a Pterin–Ruthenium(II) Sensitizer Wire. Angewandte Chemie. 120(5). 912–915. 5 indexed citations
19.
Glazer, Edith C. & Yitzhak Tor. (2002). RuII Complexes of “Large-Surface” Ligands. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 41(21). 4022–4026. 32 indexed citations
20.
Luedtke, Nathan W., et al.. (2002). Eilatin Ru(II) Complexes Display Anti-HIV Activity and Enantiomeric Diversity in the Binding of RNA. ChemBioChem. 3(8). 766–766. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026