Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 444 indexed citations. Written by Brock S. Howerton, David K. Heidary and Edith C. Glazer covering the research area of Oncology, Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (228 citations), Organic Chemistry (216 citations) and Materials Chemistry (206 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Countries where authors are citing Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Strained Ruthenium Complexes Are Potent Light-Activated Anticancer Agents.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja3009677.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026