Edgardo Reich
About
In The Last Decade
Edgardo Reich
7 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Psychiatry and Mental health 180
- Clinical Psychology 76
- Molecular Biology 47
- Neurology 40
- General Health Professions 38
Countries citing papers authored by Edgardo Reich
This map shows the geographic impact of Edgardo Reich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edgardo Reich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edgardo Reich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edgardo Reich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edgardo Reich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edgardo Reich. The network helps show where Edgardo Reich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edgardo Reich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edgardo Reich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edgardo Reich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edgardo Reich. Edgardo Reich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | [Munchausen's syndrome: a factitious disorder? A case report]. | 1 |
| 3 | 230 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.