Eder Cáceres

18 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Eder Cáceres
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Genetics 55
  • Neurology 34
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 10
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 56
  • Neurology 24
Replace Elena Zapata‐Arriaza with:
Elena Zapata‐Arriaza Spain
Axel Goldammer Germany
Valery Kornienko Russia
Chao You China
Jaeho Hwang United States
Shay Ben‐Shachar Israel
Elena Roca Italy
Kiran Talekar United States
Gabriella D’Apolito Italy
Courtney Duong United States
Eder Cáceres relative to Elena Zapata‐Arriaza Spain Elena Zapata‐Arriaza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Elena Zapata‐Arriaza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eder Cáceres

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eder Cáceres's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eder Cáceres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eder Cáceres more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eder Cáceres

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eder Cáceres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eder Cáceres. The network helps show where Eder Cáceres may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eder Cáceres, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eder Cáceres Line = papers co-authored together Eder Cáceres links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201339
2 201438
3 202336
4 202119
5 202418
6 201715
7 202114
8 201910
9 20239
10 20207
11 20244
12 20253
13 20252
14 20252
15 20252
16 20241
17 20251
18 20241
19 20260
20 20110

About Eder Cáceres

Eder Cáceres is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Neurology, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 25 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (2 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (55 citations), Neurology (34 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (10 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (56 citations) and Neurology (24 citations). Eder Cáceres has collaborated with scholars based in Colombia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mauricio Rojas, Nayra Cárdenes, Afshin A. Divani, Ergin Koçyıldırım, C. Bermúdez, Mario Di Napoli, Anthony E. Ting, John Tedrow, Robert Deans and Masoom Desai. Their work appears in journals such as Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, Neurocritical Care, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Respiration and Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact