Eden Lin

735 citations
21 papers · 245 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • Free Will and Agency
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Papers in

    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 16
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
    • Free Will and Agency 9
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4

Eden Lin

20 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

Eden Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Philosophy 175
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 127
  • Political Science and International Relations 87
  • Social Psychology 60
  • General Decision Sciences 3
Replace Gwen Bradford with:
Gwen Bradford United States
D. Justin Coates United States
Berislav Marušić United States
Ian M. Church United States
Donald W. Bruckner United States
Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek Poland
Talbot Brewer United States
Peter A. Graham United States
Jeanine Grenberg United States
Brian Rosebury United Kingdom
Eden Lin relative to Gwen Bradford United States Gwen Bradford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Gwen Bradford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eden Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eden Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eden Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eden Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eden Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eden Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eden Lin. The network helps show where Eden Lin may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201538
2 201728
3 201424
4 201524
5 201523
6 202017
7 201814
8 201812
9 201612
10 201712
11 20148
12 20165
13 20225
14 20224
15 20174
16 20154
17 20223
18 20173
19 20183
20 20202

About Eden Lin

Eden Lin is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 21 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (16 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (11 papers), Free Will and Agency (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (175 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations), Political Science and International Relations (87 citations), Social Psychology (60 citations) and General Decision Sciences (3 citations). Eden Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Analysis, Ethics, Philosophy Compass and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact